Need help igniting liquid fuel for rocket propulsion?

In summary: I'm guessing you are talking about the liquid oxygen and kerosene?Yes, we are using liquid oxygen and kerosene as our propellants. We are also incorporating a premix/ignition chamber into the design. We are atomizing the fuel.Do you think this system would be able to achieve a higher than average thrust?I'm not really sure, I haven't done any research on this. I'm just basing this off of what I've seen in videos and reading about it.In summary, the liquid propulsion rocket is designed to be 4 meters tall and carry a 2000 pound payload. The propellants used are liquid oxygen and kerosene. The trouble is to find a
  • #1
Aki
83
0
Okay, so I'm building a liquid propulsion rocket, about 4m tall, with a 2000lb trust. The propellants used are liquid oxygen and kerosene. Now the trouble is to find a way to ignite the fuels to start the combustion. Do you guys have any ideas? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is that even legal...

A 12 foot rocket without permits, I don't think so.
 
  • #3
Once you have the fuel flowing, I'm partial to using a flashbulb with the glass cut off. Nothing like a bit of magnesium wool to get things rocking. :biggrin:
 
  • #4
2000 Lbf? Damn. You're using LOX and kerosene? Damn. How are you storing the LOX?
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Sounds pretty scary, I hope you stand way the heck back when you launch this thing... and I hope it doesn't land on anyone on the way back down. You DO realize you'll need some pretty heavy duty permits for this kind of stuff right?

That being said, I think the space shuttle uses large "sparkers" that throw hot sparks directly below the nozzle. I'm not really sure how they work, just trying to remember from videos I have seen. Once the fuel starts, it is ignited by the sparks. You could also try electrical ignition such as a hot wire, or something like a barbeque sparker.

BTW, igniting the fuel is the easy part, how did you even make this 4m rocket in the first place?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Mech_Engineer said:
That being said, I think the space shuttle uses large "sparkers" that throw hot sparks directly below the nozzle. I'm not really sure how they work, just trying to remember from videos I have seen. Once the fuel starts, it is ignited by the sparks. You could also try electrical ignition such as a hot wire, or something like a barbeque sparker.

I was thinking of the same thing; possibly with road flares? That might be a bit pf overkill, but you could be dang sure that puppy's going to light!:grumpy:
 
  • #7
Well to address everyone's concerns, this is an university student project team, and our goal is to build a reusable rocket capable of carrying a payload. We have obtained a permit from the Canadian rocketry association for launches. There are approximately 30 people working on this, and this project started about 3 years ago.

So far, I've looked at the idea of an "augmented spark plug". It's a spark plug withing a tiny chamber mounted above the combustion chamber. So a tiny bit of lox and kerosene will be injected into the tiny chamber and the spark plug will ignite it. Afterwards, this flame will spread into the main combustion chamber where more lox and kerosene will be injected.

I'm open to comments :)
 
  • #8
How about a glow plug like device. A metal conductor you can heat initially at the launch pad using a current, then which remains hot (by the ignited rocket) throughout the burn. I guess the main filament would burn out, so it would be a one off thing.

Or some blue touch paper...hehe...why complicate things.
 
  • #9
Just got a different sort of idea here. If you can incorporate a small spring-loaded piston in a cylinder (think 'pellet gun' here), an orifice from it could be installed in the combustion chamber. Remotely triggering the piston to release would force the air through into the fuel mixture. The heat of compression with the proper orifice size should be in the area of 1,000 degrees F.. That temperature is only for a fraction of a second, but should be enough to get things cooking. It was the ignition system for the caseless ammo in the old Daisy VL .22 rifle.
 
  • #10
for a low tech solution, you could use magnesium-water reaction. just put a magnesium cap at the nozzle and have something squirt water at it out of the launch pad :/ although it might not be the safest idea...
 
  • #11
I'm no chemistry wizard by any means, but I've never seen an adverse reaction involving magnesium and water. Are you thinking of sodium? If so, not a bad idea.
 
  • #12
Ki Man said:
for a low tech solution, you could use magnesium-water reaction. just put a magnesium cap at the nozzle and have something squirt water at it out of the launch pad :/ although it might not be the safest idea...

I think you mean potassium and water. Doesn't sound like a very effective solution to me.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Let's get the preliminarys out of the way. Are you incorporating small pumps to move the liquid propellants? How are they stored and mixed in the vehicle? Do you have a premix/ignition chamber incorporated in the design? Are you atomizing the fuel? Since you are going with a liquid based system, this brings up the question as to whether or not you need more spark energy.

From what I have seen of the big rocketry guys, they use solid propellants. They also use a heaftier version of the old Estes igniter which is basically two wires whose exposed ends are inclose proximity to create a spark. Since you are going with a liquid based system, this brings up the question as to whether or not you need more spark energy.
 
  • #14
Magnesium & Water = Hydrogen gas, you still have the ignition problem

A quick google brings this up http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1512585

Which describes one system, it also mentions a problem with the type of ignition system i suggested which I've heard mentioned before.

From the tests, it was observed that this injector provides well-atomized and well-mixed mixtures of fuel and oxidizer. Type of the ignition system is very critical in such systems. If a pyrotechnic igniter is used, timing becomes the most important factor. If fuel and oxidizer are injected just a few milliseconds before the igniter is activated, the igniter performance can degrade and ignites very late. Such a scenario ends with a detonative explosion and causes catastrophic damages. If the opposite happens, the nozzle exit cover opens before the fuel and oxidizer reach to the motor. In this case longer ignition delay may occur. Therefore usage of traditional igniters is quite dangerous and difficult in liquid fuelled rocket motors.

Best watch your eyebrows...
 
Last edited:
  • #15
May I suggest a solution that was used by the Germans on the V-2? They used a pinwheel firework placed in the rocket engine throat to ignite the fuel/oxidizer mixture. Or you could use a sparkling, wand-like firework that is very popular with children in America on July 4th celebrations. lots of sparks from that!
Another idea is a piezoelectric sparker, like what is used for pushbutton starters on barbeques.:smile:
 
  • #16
I would use a simple wire ignition system. Take two insulated wires separated by 1/8th inch with a cotton ball soaked in gasoline or kerosene attached to it. Create your spark with an automotive or small engine ignition coil.

-carp
PropulsionAccess.com
 
  • #17
You could pick up a $25 stun gun at a local flea market. Solder positive and negative leads to it.
 
  • #18
Not in Canada, he can't. Stun guns are classed as Prohibited Weapons up here, in the same category as switchblades, machine guns, grenades, etc.. Go figger... :rolleyes:
 
  • #19
Can you tell me what the pressure will be in you combustion chamber?

carp
PropulsionAccess.com
 
  • #20
carp said:
Can you tell me what the pressure will be in you combustion chamber?

carp
PropulsionAccess.com

It will be 100psi
 
  • #21
I decided I am going to use a spark plug, and I have the Go-Ped Kicker spark plug in mind. Has anyone else used it before?

http://www.msdpowersports.com/go-ped.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #22
I was going to suggest a spark plug. However, I wouldn't try to tap a hole in your combustion chamber and screw the spark plug in it. I would go for an offboard ignition system.

carp
http://www.propulsionaccess.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
This may not be a "good" method, but it should work and is easy to do with basic chemistry knowledge. The gist of the equation would be
Manganese(VII) oxide + meth/ethanol (Any oxidize-able organic molecule) = Ignition source; and really be something along the lines of; C2H4O2 from Mn2O7 and C2H6O

Forgive the incompleteness of this post; I'm writing in a hurry.
 
  • #24
Have you thought about designing a mechanical ignition system using a series of type 209 shotgun primers? You could set them off with a series of spring-loaded triggers to bracket the time of propellant release. These primers are really cheap and readily available so you could experiment with little cost.
 
  • #25
If its only a "one shot" device you need then perhaps a bank of capacitors and a thyristor... you could potentially get a spike of order kV & kAmps. Which I would guess (having no background in rocket ignition :smile: ) would be enough to set off a chemical reaction!

Alternatively an inductor, thyristor would do a similar job... there are alternatives to thyristors, it all depends on the exact specifications which ideally need to be carefully understood.
 

1. How does liquid fuel work in rocket propulsion?

Liquid fuel is a type of propellant used in rocket propulsion. It is made up of a combination of fuel and oxidizer, which are typically stored separately and then mixed together in a combustion chamber to create a controlled explosion. This explosion produces hot gases that are directed out the back of the rocket, creating thrust and propelling the rocket forward.

2. What type of fuel is used in liquid fuel rocket propulsion?

The most commonly used fuel in liquid fuel rocket propulsion is a hydrocarbon compound such as kerosene or liquid hydrogen. These fuels have a high energy density and can easily be stored and transported. However, other types of fuels, such as liquid methane and liquid oxygen, have also been used in certain rocket designs.

3. What is the difference between liquid fuel and solid fuel rocket propulsion?

The main difference between liquid fuel and solid fuel rocket propulsion is how the fuel is stored and ignited. In solid fuel rockets, the fuel and oxidizer are mixed together and then solidified into a single block. This block is then ignited from one end and burns continuously. In contrast, liquid fuel rockets store the fuel and oxidizer separately and mix them together as needed, allowing for more precise control of the propulsion.

4. What are the advantages of using liquid fuel in rocket propulsion?

One major advantage of using liquid fuel in rocket propulsion is the ability to control the thrust and direction of the rocket. By adjusting the flow of fuel and oxidizer, the amount of thrust can be increased or decreased, allowing for more precise movements and maneuvers. Additionally, liquid fuel rockets can be shut down and restarted, making them more versatile for longer missions.

5. What are the safety considerations when handling liquid fuel for rocket propulsion?

Handling and storing liquid fuel for rocket propulsion requires strict safety protocols. The fuels and oxidizers used are highly flammable and can be toxic if not handled properly. Specialized equipment and facilities are needed to handle and store these fuels, and any mishandling or accidents can result in serious consequences. Extensive testing and safety measures are also taken to ensure the stability and quality of the fuel before it is used in a rocket launch.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top