Special relativity: components of a metric tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the covariant and contravariant components of the metric tensor in Minkowski space using spherical coordinates. The covariant components identified are g_{00}=1, g_{11}=-1, g_{22}=-r^{2}, and g_{33}=-r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta. The relationship g_{\mu\sigma} g^{\mu\rho}=\delta^{\rho}_{\sigma} is confirmed as correct, indicating that the contravariant components are the inverses of the covariant components. The participants clarify the summation over 16 values in the metric tensor, emphasizing the significance of the main diagonal elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space and its geometry
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates in physics
  • Knowledge of metric tensors and their components
  • Basic grasp of tensor notation and Einstein summation convention
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schwarzschild metric in general relativity
  • Learn about the properties of covariant and contravariant tensors
  • Explore the implications of the Einstein summation convention in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the physical significance of metric tensors in spacetime intervals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying general relativity, tensor calculus, and the geometry of spacetime.

Uku
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An interval in Minkovski space is given in spheric coordinates as;

[tex]ds^{2}=c^{2}dt^{2}-dr^{2}-r^{2}d\theta^{2}-r^{2}sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2}[/tex]

Now I have to find the covariant and contravariant components of the metric tensor.

Homework Equations



General expression of a metric tensor is:
[tex]G=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}[/tex] which also equals [tex]ds^{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I have some messy answer written down from the lecture, but can't get it clear.
Seems that I have written down the covariant components of the metric as
[tex]g_{00}=1[/tex]
[tex]g_{11}=-1[/tex]
[tex]g_{22}=-r^{2}[/tex]
[tex]g_{33}=-r^{2}sin^{2}\theta[/tex]
Are these the covariant components that the problem asks me to find? How are they found?

I see a correlation in the Schwarzschild metric

G=[PLAIN]http://rqgravity.net/images/gravitation/Gravitation-92.gif

After this it seems that the lecturer has written down that

[tex]g_{\mu\sigma} g^{\mu\rho}=\delta^{\rho}_{\sigma}[/tex]

Is this correct?

So I get a matrix on which all the components on the main diagonal are 1. From there I can derive that the contra-variant components of the metric are simply inverses of the above covariant metric.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you expand the implied summations in [itex]ds^2 = g_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu[/tex], you get<br /> <br /> [tex]ds^2 = g_{00} dx^0 dx^0 + g_{01}dx^0dx^1 + \cdots + g_{32}dx^3dx^2 + g_{33}dx^3dx^3[/tex]<br /> <br /> Keeping in mind that [itex]x^0 = t[/itex], [itex]x^1 = r[/itex], [itex]x^2 = \theta[/itex], and [itex]x^3 = \phi[/itex], compare that expression to <br /> <br /> [tex]ds^2 = dt^2 - dr^2 - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2\sin^2\theta\,d\phi^2[/tex]<br /> <br /> You can just read off the components of [itex]g_{\mu\nu}[/itex].<br /> <br /> Your notes are correct in that [itex]g_{\mu\sigma}g^{\mu\rho}=\delta^\rho_\sigma[/itex]. Consider<br /> <br /> [tex]x_\rho = g_{\rho\sigma} x^\sigma=g_{\rho\sigma}g^{\sigma\mu}x_\mu[/tex]<br /> <br /> You can see that all [itex]g_{\rho\sigma}g^{\sigma\mu}[/itex] does is change the label of the index on [itex]x_\mu[/itex]. In other words, it's just the identity.[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

A well, actually I have a question still.
The bit:

[tex]ds^{2}=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu} dx^{\nu}[/tex]

indicates summation over 16 (4x4) values, yes? With only the main diagonal being significant on the g.

EDIT: yes, that is what happens.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
863
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K