Special Relativity, Light cones in Minkowski Diagrams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the transformation of light cones in Minkowski diagrams, specifically addressing how points outside the light cone (point Q) can be perceived as occurring before or after a point inside the light cone (point P) depending on the observer's frame of reference. It is established that a point R within the light cone is always temporally related to point P, either in the future or the past, regardless of the frame S'. The key takeaway is the mathematical condition x² > c²t², which determines the temporal relationship of events across different frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski diagrams
  • Familiarity with the concept of light cones in special relativity
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations
  • Basic grasp of spacetime intervals and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Lorentz transformations
  • Explore the implications of spacetime intervals in special relativity
  • Learn how to construct and interpret Minkowski diagrams
  • Investigate the concept of simultaneity in different reference frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, educators teaching relativity concepts, and anyone interested in the geometric interpretation of spacetime events.

king vitamin
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
486
Reaction score
245

Homework Statement



Show that a point Q outside the "light cone" can occur either before or after a point P inside the light cone (eg: at the origin), depending upon the frame of reference. Show that a point R inside the light cone is always in the future or in the past with respect to P, irrespective of frame S'.

Homework Equations


this is just diagrams


The Attempt at a Solution


I know this isn't a difficult problem, but I'm having trouble conceptualizing it because I've never even seen light cones displaced from the origin, let alone in other frames of reference. How does a light cone transform between reference frames? I can't picture it because the x' and ct' axes are no longer orthogonal when drawn over S, so I'm not sure how to represent things.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi king vitamin! :smile:

Forget the shape of the cone …

the question is just asking you to prove that x2 > c2t2, then in some frames t' > 0 but in others t' < 0 (while if x2 < c2t2, then in all frames, t' has the same sign). :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
964
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K