I Special Theory of Relativity & Conservation of Mass

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether the law of conservation of mass conflicts with the first postulate of the special theory of relativity, which states that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames. It suggests that the definition of "mass" is crucial to this understanding. The consensus is that if mass is conserved in one inertial reference frame, it remains conserved in all frames, indicating no conflict exists. Participants encourage further clarification of thoughts to enhance the discussion. Overall, the law of conservation of mass aligns with the principles of relativity.
Sonuz
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends how you're defining "mass".
 
As with your last thread, if you explain your thinking a bit more we'll be able to give more helpful answers.
 
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
Conservation means does not change over time. What the first postulate would say is:

If mass is conserved in one inertial reference frame, then it is conserved in them all.
 
  • Like
Likes robphy, vanhees71 and Ibix
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
No. Why do you think it might conflict?
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
962
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K