I Special Theory of Relativity & Conservation of Mass

Sonuz
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends how you're defining "mass".
 
As with your last thread, if you explain your thinking a bit more we'll be able to give more helpful answers.
 
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
Conservation means does not change over time. What the first postulate would say is:

If mass is conserved in one inertial reference frame, then it is conserved in them all.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes robphy, vanhees71 and Ibix
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
No. Why do you think it might conflict?
 

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Charge conservation and special relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Noether's second theorem: two questions
Replies
7
Views
3K
A A global energy conservation law in general relativity
Replies
36
Views
585
I Does the metric in general relativity depend only on position because of the equivalence principle?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I SR textbooks discussing accelerated reference frames without delving into GR
Replies
36
Views
4K
I Constants of motion symmetric spacetimes
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Conservation of momentum in a collision
2
Replies
67
Views
6K
I Symmetry of motion in the special theory of relativity
Replies
37
Views
2K
I Energy conservation in general relativity
Replies
12
Views
3K
I Does string theory falsify the theory of special relativity?
Replies
19
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top