I Special Theory of Relativity & Conservation of Mass

Sonuz
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends how you're defining "mass".
 
As with your last thread, if you explain your thinking a bit more we'll be able to give more helpful answers.
 
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
Conservation means does not change over time. What the first postulate would say is:

If mass is conserved in one inertial reference frame, then it is conserved in them all.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes robphy, vanhees71 and Ibix
Sonuz said:
Does the law of conservation of mass fail to meet the first postulate of the special theory of relativity(the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference)?
No. Why do you think it might conflict?
 

Thread 'Question about Parallel Transport'

In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
View full post »

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »

Thread 'Trying to calculate proper time of worldlines using rotating frames'

So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Charge conservation and special relativity
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Noether's second theorem: two questions
Replies
7
Views
3K
A A global energy conservation law in general relativity
Replies
36
Views
493
I Does the metric in general relativity depend only on position because of the equivalence principle?
Replies
16
Views
2K
I SR textbooks discussing accelerated reference frames without delving into GR
Replies
36
Views
4K
I Constants of motion symmetric spacetimes
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Conservation of momentum in a collision
2
Replies
67
Views
6K
I Symmetry of motion in the special theory of relativity
Replies
37
Views
2K
I Energy conservation in general relativity
Replies
12
Views
3K
I Does string theory falsify the theory of special relativity?
Replies
19
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top