Specific Rotation of 4-Methoxy-d-Mannose in Tetrasaccharide Hydrolysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter amit25
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Specific
Click For Summary
The specific rotation of a tetrasaccharide was measured at -20.5°, and after hydrolysis, the optical rotation was -36.9°. The calculation for the specific rotation of 4-methoxy-d-mannose was attempted using the formula involving the specific rotations of other monosaccharides, resulting in an estimate of 14.2°. However, concerns were raised about the assumptions made regarding the concentrations of the monosaccharides after hydrolysis, as the mass of products is typically higher than the original reactant. The wording of the question was criticized for lacking clarity on the conditions of the hydrolyzed solution, leading to potential inaccuracies in the calculations.
amit25
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

The specific rotation of a tetrasaccharide was measured to be -20.5°. Upon complete hydrolysis in acid the optical rotation of the solution was found to be -36.9°. Knowing that the specific rotations of n-acetylgalacosamine,3-deoxy-l-fucose and 2-deoxy-D-ribose are -105°,-75.7° and 18.7°. What is the specific rotation of 4-methoxy-d-mannose?
b]2. Homework Equations [/b]

The Attempt at a Solution



1/4(-105)+1/4(-75.5)+1/4(18.7)+1/4x=-36.9

and solve for x=14.2 for 4-methoxy-d-mannose

Can anyone tell me If I am doing this correctly? It seems too simple...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Close, but not necessarily correct. You can't assume hydrolyzing tetrasaccharide solution that is 1 g/mL of the original compound you will get 0.25 g/mL of each produced monosaccharide, their concentrations will be in general higher (hydrolysis consumes water, so the mass of products is higher than the mass of the main reactant). To find exact concentrations you need to follow the reaction stoichiometry and molar masses.

I don't like the question. It says "optical rotation of the solution was found", not defining the solution. Either we are expected to do some unlikely assumptions, or whoever worded the question didn't think about it for long enough. We can assume it is a hydrolyzed solution that was used for the specific rotation measurement (so it was initially 1 g/mL of tetrasaccharide) but I find it hard to believe in practice nothing has changed - hydrolysis requires adding of an acid, heating and so on - final solution is definitely different, unless we did some unmentioned extra tricks.
 
Thanks, hmmm..im not sure if we're expected to make some assumptions but that's how the Question was worded exactly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
8K