Spectral lines in the emission spectrum for an electron at n= 3

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53
Homework Statement
Find the spectral lines of in the emission spectrum for an electron excited to 3rd Orbit.
Relevant Equations
One line belonging to n=3 to n =1or two lines belonging to n=3 to n =2 and then n=2 to =1.
Since there is only one excited electron, it could come from n=3 to n =1directly or n=3 to n =2 and then n=2 to =1.

Hence, there could be one or two lines depending upon the path taken by electron.
Is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. This assumes you're considering a simplified model of hydrogen, say, where effects due to electron spin are ignored. In particular, the assumption here is that there is only one energy value corresponding to a particular value of n.

Instead of saying there could be one or two lines depending upon the path taken by the electron, I think most people would say there are three lines that can be produced corresponding to the initial state n = 3. This is because emission spectra are usually generated by repeated transitions from many atoms. Some of these transitions are directly from ##3 \rightarrow 1## and some are the indirect ##3 \rightarrow 2 \rightarrow 1##. So, all three lines would occur in the spectrum. But you are thinking about it correctly.
 
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top