Spectral radiant exitance when given temperature

  • Thread starter Thread starter Landshark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the spectral radiant exitance for a black body at a wavelength of 10 micrometers across various temperatures. The relevant equation provided is Planck's law, which includes constants C1 and C2, and an exponential function represented by "e." Participants express confusion about the equation and its components, particularly the meaning of "e" and the need for calculus knowledge. There is a request for an example calculation, as the original poster feels unprepared due to a lack of mathematical background. The conversation highlights the need for clearer instructional support in applying the Planck function.
Landshark
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the spectral radiant exitance for a 10um black body at the following temperatures: -12.0°C, 0°C, 12°C, 1600 K, and 2500 K

Known:
wavelength = 10um
temperature = see above

Homework Equations



Planck's equation I think

The Attempt at a Solution



No idea. I can't figure out the equation (I am a major noob at this). The given equation is:

Mλ = C1 / (λ5 [e(C2/λT) - 1)

λ = wavelength in micrometres
T = temperature in Kelvin

C1 and C2 are supposed to be Planck's constants. What does the "e" mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Landshark said:

Homework Statement



Calculate the spectral radiant exitance for a 10um black body at the following temperatures: -12.0°C, 0°C, 12°C, 1600 K, and 2500 K

Known:
wavelength = 10um
temperature = see above

Homework Equations



Planck's equation I think

The Attempt at a Solution



No idea. I can't figure out the equation (I am a major noob at this). The given equation is:

Mλ = C1 / (λ5 [e(C2/λT) - 1)

λ = wavelength in micrometres
T = temperature in Kelvin

C1 and C2 are supposed to be Planck's constants. What does the "e" mean?

WOW, okay, you are missing some fundamental math background here. Have you had a course in calculus yet?

Try reading through these articles:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_(mathematical_constant)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_function
 
cepheid said:
Have you had a course in calculus yet?

Nope, lol. It's for a geography class.

I assume the e means 2.71828 then?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Landshark said:
Nope, lol. It's for a geography class.

I assume the e means 2.71828 then?

Yeah. Did you read those articles (or at least the intros for each one)? The Planck function includes an exponential function (which is e to the power of some variable).
 
I read the intros, yes. I think I just need an example of this equation done for me. The teacher of my class didn't really give us one.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K