Spectral theory in quantum mechanics

guhan
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
Can someone please tell me what the integrand in the below equation mean?
1 = \langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d \langle \psi |E_\lambda \psi \rangle
where,
E_\lambda is an increasing (and absolutely continuous) function of projection operators such that \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dE_\lambda = I

( I read the integrand as a differential (or measure) of a complex constant, which should have been zero!? So I am certainly wrong in interpreting it)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that E_\lambda corresponds to an element of a continuous set of projection operators i.e. E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| with the completeness relation
\int dE_\lambda\equiv \int d\lambda |\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda|=1.

In this sense the equation you wrote simply means

1=\langle\psi|\psi\rangle=\langle\psi|(\int dE_\lambda )|\psi\rangle =\int d\underbrace{\lambda\langle\psi|\lambda\rangle\langle \lambda|\psi\rangle}_{\langle \psi |E_\lambda\psi\rangle}

Hope this helps
 
Last edited:
Thanks!.. I get the drift.

As in, in the case of \lambda belonging to the spectrum of position operators,
\langle \psi | E_\lambda \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\lambda} |\psi |^2 dx
which is absolutely continuous and its differential is well defined (= | \psi |^2)

But, is writing E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| valid even for \lambda \in spectrum, which can be continuous?
I was of the opinion that it is valid only when \lambda is an eigenvalue (and hence discrete).


And when you wrote E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda|, I assume you meant the following:
E_\lambda=\sum_{\lambda_i \le \lambda} |\lambda_i\rangle\langle\lambda_i|
 
guhan said:
Thanks!.. I get the drift.

As in, in the case of \lambda belonging to the spectrum of position operators,
\langle \psi | E_\lambda \psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\lambda} |\psi |^2 dx
which is absolutely continuous and its differential is well defined (= | \psi |^2)

Actually I think the answer I gave was not really what you were looking for. I just took a shot in the dark. To answer what the integrand means I would have to know in what context it appears. And I have a feeling even then I probably am not the right person to answer.

But, is writing E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| valid even for \lambda \in spectrum, which can be continuous?
I was of the opinion that it is valid only when \lambda is an eigenvalue (and hence discrete).

I think that, in a "rigged" Hilbert space, continuous eigenvalues are allowed and one can safely write E_\lambda=|\lambda\rangle\langle \lambda and even 1=\int d\lambda |\lambda\rangle\langle\lambda| but I don't know how to prove this or where proof could be found.


Sorry for not being able to help you. I hope somebody comes along who can.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top