I Spectrum energy of a particle moving on a circumference

Lola1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If you consider the one-dimensional case of a particle constrained to move on the edge of a circumference, the energy spectrum is continuous and two times degenerate. Why the fact that the particle can move in clockwise and counterclockwise implies that the spectrum is degenerate twice?
In any case thanks to the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moving clockwise and anticlockwise at the same absolute momentum has the same energy as it is symmetric. Two states with the same energy.
 
  • Like
Likes Lola1
Mathematically double degeneration is known by 2 that multiplies the exponents of the exponential solution? (Which we get by imposing the boundary conditions):
ψ (x) = α \exp (2i (nπ / L ) x) + β \exp (-2i (nπ / L) x)
 
Lola1 said:
Mathematically double degeneration is known by 2 that multiplies the exponents of the exponential solution?
I don't understand that sentence.

You can write down the general solution like that, but you can also let n be positive or negative, and of course you can always have superpositions of those solutions.
 
I meant that the two who multiplies the exponents indicates that the energy spectrum is degenerate twice...is it true? Furthermore if the energy spectrum is degenerate twice means that his energy levels are equally spaced (but with spacing that is En=(2n^2π^2)⋅(ħ^2)/mL^2 ,unlike the energy levels of the particle in a box where the levels are En=(n^2π^2)⋅(ħ^2)/mL^2 ) or are one double the previous one?
 
The 2 in the exponent is part of a factor (2pi), the circumference of a circle. It has nothing to do with multiplicities.

The difference between energy levels is independent of the multiplicities. It arises from the detailed structure of the potential, while the multiplicity is based on the symmetry. Every symmetric potential will have this multiplicity, but it can have different steps between the energy levels.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top