Speed of a ball rolling down an incline

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a hollow basketball rolling down a 30° incline from rest, with a focus on determining its speed after traveling 8.4 m along the incline without needing the mass or radius of the ball.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach the problem without the mass or radius, seeking guidance on relevant equations. Some participants suggest using conservation of energy and the relationship between translational and rotational motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the use of conservation of energy and discussing the implications of mass and radius in the context of the problem. There is an acknowledgment of the importance of these concepts, but no consensus has been reached on a specific method or solution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of instruction on solving similar problems without mass, indicating a potential gap in understanding the application of energy conservation in this context.

captainjack
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hollow basketball rolls down a 30[tex]\circ[/tex] incline. If it starts from rest, what is its speed after it's gone 8.4 m along the incline?

Homework Equations



v=[tex]\omega[/tex]R

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know where to start with this. I've done similar problems, but I was given the mass of the rolling object. What equations would I need to manipulate so that I don't need the mass or radius of the basketball? I feel like this is a fairly simple problem, but my professor never showed us how to do one without mass, and the book doesn't explain either.

I know that to receive help here I'm supposed to have made an attempt at the problem, but I would greatly appreciate any help. Even if it is just a few equations that I should be looking at.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi captainjack! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :wink:)

call the mass "m" and the radius "r", and use conservation of energy, with your rolling constraint v = ωr …

what do you get? :smile:
 
Just call the mass m, and the radius of the ball be R. They will cancel.
Conservation of energy is very useful for such problems. The ball rolls, so it has both translational and rotational kinetic energy, and rolling means that the speed of translation and the angular speed of rotation are related as v=wR.

Edit:Tiny-tim beat me ...

ehild
 
Thank you so much (: figured it was some super important rule I was forgetting XP
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
4K