Speed of Gravity: Experts' Opinion

  • Thread starter Thread starter bayan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Speed
Click For Summary
The speed of gravity is debated, with some sources claiming it matches the speed of light while others suggest it could be significantly faster. According to general relativity, changes in gravitational force propagate at the speed of light, meaning distant objects only feel gravitational effects after a delay proportional to their distance. Current technology has not yet detected gravitational waves, but experiments like LIGO aim to measure their speed, which preliminary findings suggest is close to the speed of light. Some participants argue for the possibility of faster-than-light communication, referencing quantum experiments, while others emphasize the constraints imposed by relativity. The discussion reflects ongoing uncertainty and exploration in understanding gravitational dynamics and their implications in physics.
  • #31
NoTime said:
Ok, that seems to be a GR take on things.
Did you have a non-GR take in mind?
NoTime said:
As stated elsewhere in this thread gravity is not a force in GR.
Agreed, gravity is not a force in the usual sense under GR, so, what is your point?
NoTime said:
My problem is with the spin 2 graviton.

There seems to be a requirement that gravitons travel >> than the speed of light, being force carriers.
There is? By what?
NoTime said:
What am I missing here and how is this resolved? Are gravitons optional in quantum gravity theory?
Hard to say, it is not clear what you are assuming.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
There seems to be a requirement that gravitons travel >> than the speed of light, being force carriers.

What on Earth makes you think that?

As far as spin 2 gravitons go, if you quantize gravity, that's what you'd get. I'd strongly suggest to anyone and everyone that getting a basic handle on non-quantized gravity is a Very Good Idea before one gets too worked up over quantized gravity and gravitons.
 
  • #33
Gravity does act like a magnet, there is no doubt about that!

It is just that it acts like a magnet to mass, and not to force.

Why do we not get pulled towards the Earth in space? there are many factors one is the inverse square law, the other one is the fact that you are also being pulled by the gravitational fields of other planets and stars.
 
  • #34
bayan said:
Gravity does act like a magnet, there is no doubt about that!

It is just that it acts like a magnet to mass, and not to force.
Being as respectful of your opinion as I can, it's extremely easy to demonstrate that gravity doesn't 'act like a magnet' at all - there's no 'repulsive' counterpart.
Why do we not get pulled towards the Earth in space? there are many factors one is the inverse square law, the other one is the fact that you are also being pulled by the gravitational fields of other planets and stars.
Are you joking? The motions of solar system bodies are predictable, to a very high degree of accuracy, under Newtonian physics, and if you add General Relativity, the only apparent inconsistencies are the motions of some comets (which are now well understood in terms of the 'rocket' effect of the jets).
 
  • #35
hah!

lets get sirous now.

i was kidding about the second part, but with the first part wouldn't they be attracted to each other? when i say "act like magnet" i do not mean that they have "+" & "-" ends. Rather what i meant was that they will get "pulled towars each other". If there is an explenation why it is not like that please post.
 
  • #36
Chronos said:
Did you have a non-GR take in mind?
Yes QFT, LQG.

Chronos said:
Agreed, gravity is not a force in the usual sense under GR, so, what is your point?
That I think I have some idea of how GR does its thing? :biggrin:

pervect said:
What on Earth makes you think that?
I don't. It's actually something I have read.
With a light speed graviton the force vector points in the wrong direction.

Also, it seems to be the reason for the question "What's the speed of gravity?" in the first place.

Does this question of the speed of gravity arise from some other source?
Am I supposed to accept that gravitons are not limited to the speed of light?
Is there some way, retaining the speed of light, to handle this?
Are these quantum gravity theories just plain wrong?
 
  • #37
bayan said:
hah!

lets get sirous now.

i was kidding about the second part, but with the first part wouldn't they be attracted to each other? when i say "act like magnet" i do not mean that they have "+" & "-" ends. Rather what i meant was that they will get "pulled towars each other". If there is an explenation why it is not like that please post.
As there are no magnetic monopoles (at least, no experimental evidence of such), one cannot ignore the 'dipole' nature of magnets and magnetism 'just because'. Further, since there are no monopoles, it's very easy to demonstrate that magnetic fields don't follow the inverse square law (gravity does). Finally, there are an awful lot of 'pulled towards each other' things out in the universe - gravity, electrostatic, magnetic, springs, surface tension, ... - one needs to go at least a tiny step further before sharing 'ideas before morning coffee' with others, especially in PF.

bayan 0, Einstein+Newton 2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K