Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Speed of pendulum at certain angles

  1. Jun 19, 2017 #1
    I'm having no problem finding the maximum speed of a pendulum but I'm not sure when I move its start point and measure point.

    I would like to know the speed of a pendulum at 30 degrees that has been dropped at 140 Degrees. I'm just giving some numbers to explain that it is above the horizontal and doesn't pass through equilibrium.

    Any thought's on this would be useful.

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 19, 2017 #2

    phinds

    User Avatar
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    You need to give more background. Where are you in school? What math have you taken?
     
  4. Jun 19, 2017 #3
    Out of school, AS level Math.

    This isn't homework, just a practical problem I'm trying to get my head around.

    All of my usual point of calls don't like pendulums that go above the horizontal (I guess GCSE assumes it's made of string) and I can only find equations for Vmax.
     
  5. Jun 19, 2017 #4

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    As with many such problems, you can either approach this problem by considering the Forces involved or by considering the Energy transfer. The Maths is pretty straightforward if you work out the change in gravitational potential energy and the corresponding gain in Kinetic Energy. That is an enormous clue!!!
    That assumes the pendulum uses a solid rod (like most practical pendulums, aamof) If you want to assume string then you would have to know an awful lot more about the set up - the shape of the bob, for instance.
     
  6. Jun 19, 2017 #5
    Right, so if I take energy of pendulum equation as

    PE = mgL(1 – COS θ)

    Mass should be irrelevant for this(?)

    9.81*1*(1-cos(140))=13.2
    9.81*1*(1-cos(30))=7.5

    = 5.7j change

    KE=1/2mv^2
    2KE=mv^2
    sqrt(2KE)=mv

    Ignore M, so that V = sqrt(2*5.7)
    =3.38m/s

    Is that looking ok?
     
  7. Jun 19, 2017 #6

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    You lost L somewhere??? But that's the sort of thing I meant.
     
  8. Jun 19, 2017 #7
    Yeah L=1, sorry.
     
  9. Jun 19, 2017 #8

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    By choosing a magic number for L you have thrown away an important part of the relationship. The speed cannot be independent of L, can it, so you should include the length even if you later happen to give it a value of 1m, 1cm, 1km.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted