Speed of progressive waves numerical

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the speed of progressive waves given a frequency of 300 Hz and the distance between adjacent nodes in a stationary wave system, which is 1.5 m.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between wave speed, frequency, and wavelength, questioning the correct application of the formula v = fλ. They explore how the distance between nodes relates to wavelength and consider different interpretations of the problem setup.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of wave properties, with some participants providing guidance on distinguishing between wavelength and the distance between nodes. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, and clarification on the relationships involved is being sought.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly identifying the wavelength in relation to the distance between nodes, as well as the potential confusion arising from variable naming in the formulas presented.

lionel messi.
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement :
progressive waves of frequency 300 hz are superimposed to produce a system of stationary waves in which adjacent nodes are 1.5m apart.calculate speed of progressive waves?


2. The attempt at a solution:
should i use
1)v=f*λ=300m/s
or
2)v=f*(2λ)=900m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lionel messi. said:
1. Homework Statement :
progressive waves of frequency 300 hz are superimposed to produce a system of stationary waves in which adjacent nodes are 1.5m apart.calculate speed of progressive waves?2. The attempt at a solution:
should i use
1)v=f*λ=300m/s
or
2)v=f*(2λ)=900m/s
Be careful here.

The symbol for wavelength is pretty much always denoted as λ. And the velocity of a wave is always v = λf (where f is the frequency). This relationship wasn't used correctly in 2), given your choice of variable names.

(Not to mention that the math in 1 isn't right either; 300 x 1.5 ≠ 300)

What you should be asking yourself is "how many nodes occur in one wavelength?"

Try plotting cos x on a piece of paper. Don't forget to put the x-axis and y-axis on the plot. From one peak to the next peak of the function (one wavelength), how many times does the function cross the x-axis? :wink:
 
sorry my bad @ 1.
in 2, I've used 2λ because the distance between 2 consecutive nodes is λ/2..so used L=λ/2 or 2L=λ which results in 900 m/s..
 
lionel messi. said:
sorry my bad @ 1.
in 2, I've used 2λ because the distance between 2 consecutive nodes is λ/2..so used L=λ/2 or 2L=λ
That's good. :approve:
which results in 900 m/s..
Wait, you've determined a length. Just make sure you distinguish the difference between the wavelenth λ and the and the distance between nodes. Both are distances, but they are different distances.

Once you've determined λ, v = fλ still applies. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K