Speed of Sound: Constant Irrespective of Source Speed

PavanKumar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

As far as I know the speed of sound is also constant irrespective of the speed of the source. I guess, this is an obvious result of the property of waves. So, why is the constancy of speed of a light wave more important?

Please point out if there are any mistakes in my assumptions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi PavanKumar, welcome to PF!

In a "nice" medium the speed of sound is isotropic, homogenous, and independent of the speed of the source. In vacuum the speed of light is also isotropic, homogenous, and independent of the speed of the source.

Where they differ is that the speed of light is frame invariant, whereas the speed of sound is not. It is the invariance, and not the constancy, that makes the speed of light so important.
 
  • Like
Likes Enclose
Hi DaleSpan,

Thanks for the answer.

However, I am still a little confused. What is the simplest experiment that can prove this invariance? I believe we can't use the Michelson-Morley experiment as one because all the measurement devices and the light source were in the same frame of reference.
 
PavanKumar said:
Hi DaleSpan,

Thanks for the answer.

However, I am still a little confused. What is the simplest experiment that can prove this invariance? I believe we can't use the Michelson-Morley experiment as one because all the measurement devices and the light source were in the same frame of reference.
The MMX is exactly what proves it and the fact that the device exists in one frame of reference is key. If light behaved like sound, the experiment would show that light's speed is different in different frames (not frame invariant) and identify the frame where it is c (the "stationary frame"). Similarly, you could use an MMX type setup for sound to measure wind speed/airspeed.
 
PavanKumar said:
What is the simplest experiment that can prove this invariance?
I would start here, with this excellent review article on experimental tests of SR:
http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html#Test_Theories

"Robertson showed that one can unambiguously deduce the Lorentz transform of SR to an accuracy of ~0.1% from the following three experiments: Michelson and Morley, Kennedy and Thorndike, Ives and Stilwell. Zhang showed that modern experiments determine the Lorentz transforms to within a few parts per million."
 
PavanKumar said:
Hi,

As far as I know the speed of sound is also constant irrespective of the speed of the source. I guess, this is an obvious result of the property of waves. So, why is the constancy of speed of a light wave more important?

Please point out if there are any mistakes in my assumptions.

The speed of light is independent of the speed of the receiver as well as the speed of the source. This is different than the behavior of sound, the speed of sound is isotropic only in a special receiver frame, the frame in which the receiver is "at rest" with respect to the sound media.

The key difference for light is that there isn't any such "special" frame, the speed of light is always isotropic for any receiver / receiver frame.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top