Speed of Sound in Air as a Function of Temperature

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the speed of sound in air as a function of temperature, exploring both theoretical and experimental approaches to investigate this relationship. Participants share ideas for experiments and delve into related concepts, including the implications for aircraft and underwater acoustics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Paulene seeks experimental methods to study the speed of sound in air as it relates to temperature.
  • One suggestion involves setting up a resonant air column and varying the air temperature to observe changes in resonant frequency.
  • Another participant proposes using a sound source and a microphone in a controlled environment to measure sound travel time.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between temperature and the speed of sound, with some participants asserting that lower temperatures do not correlate with faster sound speeds in air.
  • Participants explore the concept of sonic booms in water, questioning whether similar phenomena occur underwater and how they would propagate.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the definition of Mach number in different fluids, with some confusion expressed about its application in various contexts.
  • There are discussions about the feasibility of man-made projectiles achieving speeds greater than Mach 5 in water and the challenges associated with such speeds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between temperature and the speed of sound, with no consensus reached on this point. Additionally, there is ongoing debate regarding the implications of sonic booms in water and the conditions required for them to occur.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the speed of sound and its relationship with temperature are not universally accepted, and there are unresolved questions about the experimental setups suggested. The discussion also touches on the complexities of measuring sound in different mediums, highlighting the need for careful consideration of experimental conditions.

  • #31
sophiecentaur said:
@ Danger: There must be many man made projectiles that travel at >Mach 5. That's all you would need.
Many individuals or categories?

The first generation of .17 (caliber) Remington rifle rounds were rated as 5050 fps but were de-rated in about ten years to 4000 fps for being too difficult to maintain. I brushed lead and gilding metal from my rifle's barrel each five rounds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
734
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K