Spherical Aberration Explained - Chris' Experiments

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cavis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aberration Spherical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of spherical aberration observed in concave mirrors, specifically in the context of Chris' experiments. Chris notes that while the image projected onto a flat surface remains blurry due to spherical aberration, viewing the image directly in the mirror yields a crisp result. Participants explain that this discrepancy arises because the eye acts as a small aperture, allowing only a portion of the converging light cone to enter, thus minimizing spherical aberration effects. Recommendations include experimenting with a circular aperture to further improve image clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical aberration in optics
  • Familiarity with concave mirror properties
  • Basic knowledge of light cones and image formation
  • Experience with aperture effects in photography
NEXT STEPS
  • Experiment with circular apertures in optical setups
  • Research the impact of focal length on image clarity
  • Learn about the relationship between aperture size and depth of field
  • Explore advanced concepts in optical aberrations and corrections
USEFUL FOR

Optics enthusiasts, physics students, and anyone conducting experiments with concave mirrors and image formation techniques.

cavis
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I'm having a little confusion regarding spherical aberration from some experiments I've been doing with a concave mirror. I've been directing the mirror so that it faces the distance (ie. objects at infinity) and then positioning a flat piece of paper so that an image forms on it. The image, even at is sharpest, remains somewhat blurry which is due to spherical aberration from the mirror, as far as I understand.

And yet, when I look at the distance directly in the mirror (without looking at the screen), I see an image that is perfectly crisp. What am I missing here?

Thanks in advance,

Chris.
 
Science news on Phys.org
What's the focal length, diameter, and F-Ratio of your mirror?

How far from the mirror are you placing your eye when you look in it? Very close to the focal plane, behind it, or in front of it?

It seems to me that your eye may only be getting part of the converging light cone from the mirror. If you take only a small piece of the light cone, the spherical aberration is greatly reduced.
 
cavis said:
Hi there,
I'm having a little confusion regarding spherical aberration from some experiments I've been doing with a concave mirror. I've been directing the mirror so that it faces the distance (ie. objects at infinity) and then positioning a flat piece of paper so that an image forms on it. The image, even at is sharpest, remains somewhat blurry which is due to spherical aberration from the mirror, as far as I understand.

And yet, when I look at the distance directly in the mirror (without looking at the screen), I see an image that is perfectly crisp. What am I missing here?

Thanks in advance,

Chris.
That's a very astute observation. I agree with Drakkith about the reason. When you look at the image directly, you are effectively putting a tiny aperture in the way (your pupil), which means that each part of the image you are looking at is coming from only a small part of the reflector and the errors are small.
In cameras, the lens distortions are always less and the depth of focus is always much greater when using a small aperture. You could try putting a circular aperture in the way of your mirror and see how the projected image improves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K