I Spherical aberration in Biconvex and Plano Convex lenses

AI Thread Summary
Spherical aberration in biconvex and plano convex lenses is a key consideration for optical experiments. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the derivation of related equations, with references to Maxwell's equations and the Fresnel equations for comprehensive insights into refraction and light polarization. Snell's Law is mentioned as a simpler alternative for geometrical optics applications. Ray optics is suggested as an easier approach to derive formulas for different lens types. Overall, a solid grasp of these principles is essential for accurate experimentation with lens aberrations.
VVS2000
Messages
150
Reaction score
17
I wanted to know about spherical aberration in a biconvex and plano convex lens as I was planning an experiment with them.
I was reading about them and came upon the following passage.
I don't know whether the given equation is an empirical one or a derived equation.
Can anyone help me if you have any sources regarding aberration in plano convex and bi convex lenses or how to start with deriving such an equation?
 

Attachments

  • 1639987031473540774348258502045.jpg
    1639987031473540774348258502045.jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 158
Science news on Phys.org
Everything concerning refraction can be derived from Maxwell's equations applying the right boundary conditions on the surfaces of the adjecent dielectrica (for everyday applications usually some glass lens with a given index of refraction, which is dependent on the wavelength of the light, in air, which can be treated as vacuum). You end up with the Fresnel equations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations

This gives you the complete information, including the polarization of the light.

For the purpose of geometrical optics it's sufficient to know Snell's Law, which also follows from the wave-optics derivation a la Fresnel. It's the relation for the wave vectors in and out of the medium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snell's_law
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes berkeman and sophiecentaur
vanhees71 said:
For the purpose of geometrical optics it's sufficient to know Snell's Law, which also follows from the wave-optics derivation a la Fresnel. It's the relation for the wave vectors in and out of the medium.
Ray optics is probably an easier first time around approach. It would produce an equivalent to the formula in the OP's attachment for the different lens type, I think.
 
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...

Similar threads

Back
Top