I Spherical aberration in Biconvex and Plano Convex lenses

AI Thread Summary
Spherical aberration in biconvex and plano convex lenses is a key consideration for optical experiments. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the derivation of related equations, with references to Maxwell's equations and the Fresnel equations for comprehensive insights into refraction and light polarization. Snell's Law is mentioned as a simpler alternative for geometrical optics applications. Ray optics is suggested as an easier approach to derive formulas for different lens types. Overall, a solid grasp of these principles is essential for accurate experimentation with lens aberrations.
VVS2000
Messages
150
Reaction score
17
I wanted to know about spherical aberration in a biconvex and plano convex lens as I was planning an experiment with them.
I was reading about them and came upon the following passage.
I don't know whether the given equation is an empirical one or a derived equation.
Can anyone help me if you have any sources regarding aberration in plano convex and bi convex lenses or how to start with deriving such an equation?
 

Attachments

  • 1639987031473540774348258502045.jpg
    1639987031473540774348258502045.jpg
    51.5 KB · Views: 166
Science news on Phys.org
Everything concerning refraction can be derived from Maxwell's equations applying the right boundary conditions on the surfaces of the adjecent dielectrica (for everyday applications usually some glass lens with a given index of refraction, which is dependent on the wavelength of the light, in air, which can be treated as vacuum). You end up with the Fresnel equations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_equations

This gives you the complete information, including the polarization of the light.

For the purpose of geometrical optics it's sufficient to know Snell's Law, which also follows from the wave-optics derivation a la Fresnel. It's the relation for the wave vectors in and out of the medium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snell's_law
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes berkeman and sophiecentaur
vanhees71 said:
For the purpose of geometrical optics it's sufficient to know Snell's Law, which also follows from the wave-optics derivation a la Fresnel. It's the relation for the wave vectors in and out of the medium.
Ray optics is probably an easier first time around approach. It would produce an equivalent to the formula in the OP's attachment for the different lens type, I think.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top