1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Spherical Cavity in Dielectric Subject to Uniform Field

  1. Sep 19, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    The polarization charge on the surface of a spherical cavity is [tex] - \sigma_e cos(\theta) [/tex] at a point whose radius vector from the centre makes an angle [tex] \theta [/tex]with a given axis Oz. Prove that the field strength at the centre is [tex] \frac {\sigma_e}{3 \epsilon_o} [/tex] parallel to Oz.

    If the cavity is in a uniform dielectric subject to a field of strength [tex] E_o [/tex] parallel to the direction [tex] \theta = 0 [/tex], show that [tex] \sigma_e = \frac {3 E_o \epsilon_o ( \epsilon_r -1)} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r} [/tex] where [tex] \epsilon_r [/tex] is the relative permittivity of the dielectic. Verify that that this gives the correct value for the field strength at the centre of the cavity [tex] E = \frac {3 \epsilon_r E_o} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r}[/tex] and note that [tex] \sigma_e [/tex] is not simply [tex] ( \epsilon_r - 1 ) \epsilon_o E_o [/tex] because of the distortion of the field in the dielectric caused by the presence of the cavity.




    3. The attempt at a solution

    The first part of the question is no problem and deriving the field strength in the center which it asks you to verify using boundary conditions etc. etc. is no problem.

    However polarization charge density = [tex] P . \hat{n} = - P cos( \theta ) [/tex] which is the form of what's given at the beginning of the question leading to [tex] \sigma_e = P [/tex]

    Therefore:

    [tex] P = ( \epsilon_r - 1 ) \epsilon_o E [/tex]

    Subbing in my equation for field inside:

    [tex] P = ( \epsilon_r - 1 ) \epsilon_o \frac {3 \epsilon_r E_o} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r}[/tex]

    Which is the answer they want, apart from I have an extra [tex] \epsilon_r [/tex] term in the numerator.

    Any ideas?

    Many thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2008 #2
    When I say 'my equation for field inside' I mean:

    [tex] E = \frac {3 \epsilon_r E_o} {1 + 2 \epsilon_r} [/tex]

    as verified in the question.

    Thanks everyone.
     
  4. Sep 24, 2008 #3
    Please can somebody give me some idea as to where I'm going wrong?

    :-(
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?