Spherical Coordinates Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of allowing the angle θ in spherical coordinates to range from 0 to 2π, rather than the conventional limit of 0 to π. Participants explore the mathematical and physical consequences of this change within the context of spherical coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to clarify the geometric interpretation of θ changing from 0 to 2π, noting that it corresponds to a complete rotation around the z-axis. Others question the uniqueness of coordinates in this scenario and seek illustrative examples to understand the consequences better.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the implications of the coordinate system change, with some providing examples and clarifications. There is a recognition of the potential for non-unique coordinates, and the discussion is exploring various interpretations and consequences without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the distinction between mathematical and physical conventions regarding the angles in spherical coordinates, which adds complexity to the discussion. There is also a reference to the calculation of volume in a unit sphere, highlighting the importance of correctly defining the limits of integration to avoid errors.

welatiger
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
In spherical coordinates we have three axes namely
r, θ, ∅

the ranges of these axes are

0≤r≤∞
0≤θ≤∏
0≤∅≤2∏

what will happen in a physical situation if we allow θ to change from zero to 2∏
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The physical situation would be unchanged. The mathematical model of the physical situation would be affected in that you no longer have a unique spherical coordinate for each physical point.
 
If I understand this correctly, as \theta changes from 0 to 2\pi you (or whatever point you are tracking) makes one complete circle around the z-axis. When you have completed the 2\pi you will be exactly where you were to begin, as welatiger says.

(By the way, those are coordinates, not "axes". If by "axis" you mean as line on which one coordinate changes, the others being 0, then the the "\phi" and "\theta" axes are both the z-axis, since r= 0, while the "r" axis is the x-axis.)
 
so guys i cannot understand what is the consequences of being θ running from 0 to 2∏.
so if the mathematical model of the physical theory doesn't have a unique coordinate what will happen ?.

I need a more illustrative example

Thank you
 
As \theta goes from each point moves through a circle around the z-axis.
I don't know what more you want.

Unless you are using the "physics" convention rather than the "mathmatics" convention. Mathematics has \theta measuring the angle the line from the origin to the given point's projection in the xy-plane makes with the positive x-axis while \phi measures the angle the line from the origin to the point itself makes with the z-axis. The "physics" convetion swaps x and y. If that is what you mean then as \theta goes from 0 to \pi, a point with the same r and \phi is swung down through a semi-circle, with center at the origin and radius z, from (0, 0, z) to (0, 0, -z). If you then continue to increase \theta from \pi to 2\pi the point swings through the other haf of the same circle, from (0, 0, -z) back up to (0, 0, z). Yes, if we allowed \theta to go from 0 to 2\pi we could have the same point with two different sets of coordinates. (r, \phi, \theta+ \pi) would be the same point as (r, \phi+ \pi, \theta). Which is why we restrict \theta to be from 0 to \pi rather than 2\pi.
 
welatiger said:
so guys i cannot understand what is the consequences of being θ running from 0 to 2∏.
so if the mathematical model of the physical theory doesn't have a unique coordinate what will happen ?.

I need a more illustrative example

Thank you

Here's an example of what can go wrong. I am going to assume ##\theta## is the same as in cylindrical coordinates and ##\phi## measures the angle from the ##z## axis. Suppose you wish to calculate the volume of a unit sphere:$$
V =\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^\pi\int_0^1 1\cdot \rho^2\sin\phi\, d\rho d\phi d\theta$$Here we have let ##\phi## go from ##0## to ##\pi## and ##\theta## go from ##0## to ##2\pi## to cover the whole sphere once. But we could also cover the whole sphere by letting ##\phi## go from ##0## to ##2\pi## and ##\theta## go from ##0## to ##\pi##, giving$$
V =\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^1 1\cdot \rho^2\sin\phi\, d\rho d\phi d\theta$$The first integral gives the correct volume while the second gives a volume of ##0##. Do you see where the error is? While the error can be fixed, it is best to avoid the problem in the first place and restrict ##\phi## to ##[0,\pi]##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K