Sphygmomonometers energy storage?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the energy transformations involved in using a sphygmomanometer, specifically the relationship between kinetic energy, potential energy, and work. When the bulb is squeezed, kinetic energy is generated from the movement of the hand, but the primary energy at play in the cuff is elastic potential energy, which is stored when the cuff compresses the arm. The process involves converting chemical energy from the body into work, which then transfers energy to the cuff, resulting in elastic potential energy until the cuff decompresses. The key takeaway is that while kinetic energy is present, it is not the main contributor to the forces applied during this process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the principles of work and energy transfer
  • Basic knowledge of sphygmomanometers and their function
  • Awareness of elastic potential energy and its applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of elastic potential energy in various materials
  • Explore the mechanics of blood pressure measurement using sphygmomanometers
  • Study the conversion of chemical energy to mechanical work in biological systems
  • Learn about the relationship between force, work, and energy in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, healthcare professionals using sphygmomanometers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of energy transfer in medical devices.

pnorm91
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
So energy can only be converted... So when you squeeze the bulb on a blood pressure cuff, you are applying kinetic energy. Then the cuff fills with air and constricts the arm. Is the energy in the cuff then stored potential energy, or because it is actually applying the force to the arm, is it kinetic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll put a disclaimer and say that I'm not 100% confident in this answer, but hopefully it helps clear things up. This type of question almost gets trickier the more you think about it because there are a lot of different things going on, and it's easy to get distracted by small things and miss the main points.

First of all, just because a force is applied doesn't mean kinetic energy is the main player. An object has kinetic energy because it's moving, not because it's applying a force. In this case, you're doing work on the bulb because you're applying a force and it moves some distance. Your hand applies a force to the bulb, and that comes from the chemical potential stored in your body. Of course the bulb and your hand do move, so they do have some kinetic energy, but that's not the main driver here, it's more of a necessary by-product of the fact that you're applying a force and doing work. That's maybe a subtle point, but I think it's an important one.

Now in the case of the cuff, I think elastic potential energy is the key player here. In a sense, all you're doing is compressing both the patient's arm and the gas inside the cuff. It takes work to compress them (work that came indirectly from your hand), and that work is stored as elastic potential energy, which appears as an internal force: the arm and the cuff "push back" on each other. Since neither is moving, there's no kinetic energy involved. Also, I'd like to point out that while elastic potential is present, it's NOT being "used up" to apply forces. That's something people tend to forget: force applied does not mean energy is being transferred (work). Something only does work if it applies a force and the thing it's applying force to actually moves. A box sitting on a table does no work even though it's applying a force to the table. Maybe you knew that already, but I thought I should point it out just in case.

Anyway, to answer your question simply: Chemical energy in your body --> Work done on the bulb --> Energy transferred to the cuff --> Work done to compress arm/cuff --> Elastic potential energy stored until you release it by allowing the arm/cuff to decompress.

Through the whole process, kinetic energy is present whenever things are moving, but it's never really the main driver.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: prakharpks02
Awesome! I think that sufficiently covers the whole topic! Thanks for that awesome answer!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K