Spinning blade - Effort and Force

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Centrifugal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Spinning
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on calculating the force exerted on the fulcrum by a spinning lawnmower blade and the effort required to maintain its rotation. The conversation highlights the differences between three mower models: a 30cm blade with a 1400W motor, a 33cm blade with a 1450W motor, and a 35cm blade with a 1500W motor. Participants conclude that while larger blades require more power due to increased grass resistance and moment of inertia, manufacturers may not always provide accurate power consumption data, as motors can operate below their rated capacity without issues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and torque
  • Basic principles of aerodynamics and resistance forces
  • Familiarity with electric motor specifications and performance
  • Knowledge of lawnmower mechanics and blade dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between blade diameter and power requirements in lawnmowers
  • Investigate the effects of moment of inertia on cutting efficiency
  • Learn about measuring actual power consumption of electric motors
  • Explore the physics of resistance forces in rotating blades
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, lawnmower manufacturers, and anyone involved in the design or optimization of lawnmower performance will benefit from this discussion.

Centrifugal
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How do I calculate the force exerted on the fulcrum (center) from a spinning blade and the effort required to spin it.

In a practical example:

A spinning lawnmower blade. If the blade of length x and mass y was exchanged with a heavier longer blade how much more effort would be required to spin that blade.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this has to do with the air resistance (and grass resistance if we are talking about a lawnmower). Otherwise you do not need any torque (force) to keep it spinning, since we have conservation of angular momentum. To get it spinning in the first place you need some power.

With regards to the air resistance I have no idea and leave the topic for others.
 
To develop the practical example further, or rather, the situation that got me thinking about it...

A lawnmower has a 1450w motor and has a 33cm blade. The next model up has a 35mm blade and a 1500w motor.

Both models have the same chassis. Only the blades and motor are different.

Therefore, is there an increase in the effort require from the motor to keep a slightly larger heavier blade spinning.

Would the increase in length and mass of the blade require the extra 50w in motor power, or is this just model/range marketing policy by the manufacturer.

Taking the "grass resistance" into account, as the motor would be required to drive the blade in light and heavy grass conditions, one would assume that there must be ample power to drive a slightly larger blade.
 
Centrifugal said:
Taking the "grass resistance" into account, as the motor would be required to drive the blade in light and heavy grass conditions, one would assume that there must be ample power to drive a slightly larger blade.

I think you've hit it on the head here. The motor definitely has enough power to spin a larger blade. A larger blade covers a larger area though (area going up as the square of the radius, so even 2cm makes a difference). This larger area means you're cutting a bit more grass, and ripping apart all that cellulose is probably what requires the extra power.

If you really want to get into it you could look up the rest of the manufacturers data, and by using the average speed of the mower cook up a graph of average turf cut per second vs engine power.
 
Looking at the specs of the mowers I notice that all are rated to spin at 4300rpm.

The three mowers all have the same chassis and only differ in the following:

30cm blade 1400w motor

33cm blade 1450w motor

35cm blade 1500w motor.

As all three are rated to run at 4300rpm, (assuming this is an accurate measurement) could there be a relationship between the motor power and blade length in order to maintain the rpm of 4300?
 
To be honest, physics isn't too good at handling these practical problems because there're just so many unknowns. But, we can try.
The resistance will be higher when actively cutting grass. But the resistance is pretty low when not cutting grass, so there might be some kind of rate limiting device in the motor to keep it from spinning too fast. I don't know much about lawn mowers, so this is just an assumption.

Let's assume that when the mower is pushed forward with constant velocity into uncut grass. Then the grass resistance is proportional to the wingspan of the blades. In other words, the power needed should be proportional to the diameter of the blade. Your data shows that this is incorrect. Maybe the higher speed of the edge of the larger blade or the higher moment of inertia makes it better at cutting, so the power needed grows smaller than proportionally to the wingspan.
 
What Khashish said but...

Then the grass resistance is proportional to the wingspan of the blades. In other words, the power needed should be proportional to the diameter of the blade. Your data shows that this is incorrect

It is roughly proportional to the diameter (or at least more so than to the area). However the makers data is not intended to be used for this purpose. The maker may well specify a 1500W motor but that doesn't mean it will draw 1500W. You would have to measure actual consumption.

It's not unknown for a manufacture to fit the same motor to all models to reduce costs and just change the spec. A 1500W rated motor will happily run at 1400W and may live longer as a result. Most types of electric motors won't over speed if they are lightly loaded.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
846
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K