MHB Split Epimorphisms .... Bland Proposition 3.2.4 ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Split
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book "Rings and Their Modules" ...

Currently I am focused on Section 3.2 Exact Sequences in [FONT=MathJax_Main]Mod[FONT=MathJax_Math]R ... ...

I need some help in order to fully understand Proposition 3.2.4 ...

Proposition 3.2.4 reads as follows:
View attachment 8076
Can someone please explain exactly how Proposition 3.2.3 establishes Proposition 3.2.4 ...
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

This is a consequence of the remark after definition 3.2.2.

In the case of proposition 3.2.4, $g':M_2\to M$ is a split monomorphism with splitting map $g$, and you can use proposition 3.2.3.
 
castor28 said:
Hi Peter,

This is a consequence of the remark after definition 3.2.2.

In the case of proposition 3.2.4, $g':M_2\to M$ is a split monomorphism with splitting map $g$, and you can use proposition 3.2.3.
Thanks for the help, castor28 ...

Peter
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K