MHB Split Epimorphisms .... Bland Proposition 3.2.4 ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Split
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book "Rings and Their Modules" ...

Currently I am focused on Section 3.2 Exact Sequences in [FONT=MathJax_Main]Mod[FONT=MathJax_Math]R ... ...

I need some help in order to fully understand Proposition 3.2.4 ...

Proposition 3.2.4 reads as follows:
View attachment 8076
Can someone please explain exactly how Proposition 3.2.3 establishes Proposition 3.2.4 ...
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

This is a consequence of the remark after definition 3.2.2.

In the case of proposition 3.2.4, $g':M_2\to M$ is a split monomorphism with splitting map $g$, and you can use proposition 3.2.3.
 
castor28 said:
Hi Peter,

This is a consequence of the remark after definition 3.2.2.

In the case of proposition 3.2.4, $g':M_2\to M$ is a split monomorphism with splitting map $g$, and you can use proposition 3.2.3.
Thanks for the help, castor28 ...

Peter
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
Back
Top