Splitting Polynomials into Even and Odd Parts: A Unique Direct Sum Decomposition

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
1. Let [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n^+[/tex] and [tex]} \mathbb{R}[x]_n^-[/tex] denote the vector subspaces of even and odd polynomials in [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n[/tex]

Show [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n=\mathbb{R}[x]_n^+ \oplus\mathbb{R}[x]_n^-[/tex]

3. For every [tex]p^+(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x]_n^+[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle p^+(x)=\sum_{m=0}^n a_m x^m=p^+(-x)[/tex]

So [tex]a_m = 0[/tex] for [tex]m=2k+1, k=0,1,2,...[/tex] else [tex]a_m \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]. Similarly, [tex]a_m=0[/tex] for [tex]m=2k, k=0,1,2,...[/tex] if the function is odd.

[tex]p^+(x)=a_0+a_2x^2+a_4x^4+\cdots, a_m\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]

[tex]p^-(x)=a_1x+a_3x^3+a_5x^5+\cdots a_m\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]

[tex]p(x)=a_0+a_2x^2+a_4x^4+\cdots+a_1x+a_3x^3+a_5x^5+\cdots[/tex] for every [tex]p(x)\in \mathbb{R}[x]_n[/tex]. So every [tex]p(x)[/tex] is some [tex]p^+(x)[/tex] with some [tex]p^-(x)[/tex]. Is this enough? Is it better to find a basis for the two subspaces and show that the union of the two basis sets spans [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n[/tex] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All that stuff about odd and even powers is true, but it's probably easiest to prove it if you use the projection operators p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2.
 
Say p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2. Then say that p(x)= p+(x)+p-(x) for all p(x) in R[x]_n?
 
Gregg said:
Say p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2. Then say that p(x)= p+(x)+p-(x) for all p(x) in R[x]_n?

Sure. That splits a polynomial into an even part and an odd part, which is exactly the power split you are talking about. Then I suppose you would want to show that the split is unique. That if p(x)=e(x)+o(x) where e(x) is even and o(x) is odd, then e(x)=p+(x) and o(x)=p-(x), right? Might depend on how exactly your definition of 'direct sum' is phrased.