Splitting Polynomials into Even and Odd Parts: A Unique Direct Sum Decomposition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around the decomposition of polynomials into even and odd parts within the context of the vector space of polynomials over the reals, specifically focusing on the properties and definitions of even and odd polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of even and odd polynomials, considering the use of projection operators to demonstrate the decomposition. Questions arise regarding the sufficiency of the initial approach and whether finding a basis for the subspaces would be more effective.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the properties of polynomial decomposition, with some participants suggesting methods for proving the uniqueness of the split into even and odd parts. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of definitions related to direct sums and the uniqueness of polynomial decomposition, which may depend on the phrasing of these definitions.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
1. Let [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n^+[/tex] and [tex]} \mathbb{R}[x]_n^-[/tex] denote the vector subspaces of even and odd polynomials in [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n[/tex]

Show [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n=\mathbb{R}[x]_n^+ \oplus\mathbb{R}[x]_n^-[/tex]

3. For every [tex]p^+(x) \in \mathbb{R}[x]_n^+[/tex] [tex]\displaystyle p^+(x)=\sum_{m=0}^n a_m x^m=p^+(-x)[/tex]

So [tex]a_m = 0[/tex] for [tex]m=2k+1, k=0,1,2,...[/tex] else [tex]a_m \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]. Similarly, [tex]a_m=0[/tex] for [tex]m=2k, k=0,1,2,...[/tex] if the function is odd.

[tex]p^+(x)=a_0+a_2x^2+a_4x^4+\cdots, a_m\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]

[tex]p^-(x)=a_1x+a_3x^3+a_5x^5+\cdots a_m\in\mathbb{R}[/tex]

[tex]p(x)=a_0+a_2x^2+a_4x^4+\cdots+a_1x+a_3x^3+a_5x^5+\cdots[/tex] for every [tex]p(x)\in \mathbb{R}[x]_n[/tex]. So every [tex]p(x)[/tex] is some [tex]p^+(x)[/tex] with some [tex]p^-(x)[/tex]. Is this enough? Is it better to find a basis for the two subspaces and show that the union of the two basis sets spans [tex]\mathbb{R}[x]_n[/tex] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All that stuff about odd and even powers is true, but it's probably easiest to prove it if you use the projection operators p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2.
 
Say p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2. Then say that p(x)= p+(x)+p-(x) for all p(x) in R[x]_n?
 
Gregg said:
Say p+(x)=(p(x)+p(-x))/2 and p-(x)=(p(x)-p(-x))/2. Then say that p(x)= p+(x)+p-(x) for all p(x) in R[x]_n?

Sure. That splits a polynomial into an even part and an odd part, which is exactly the power split you are talking about. Then I suppose you would want to show that the split is unique. That if p(x)=e(x)+o(x) where e(x) is even and o(x) is odd, then e(x)=p+(x) and o(x)=p-(x), right? Might depend on how exactly your definition of 'direct sum' is phrased.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
9K