(Spring constant) I can't figure out what I did wrong.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant for two springs in series with a mass attached. The initial approach incorrectly applied conservation of energy, leading to an erroneous factor of 2 in the numerator of the spring constant formula. The correct method involves using the definition of spring constant, K = F/Δx, which simplifies to K = mg/(x1+x2). Participants clarify that the system's stationary state requires consideration of additional forces to prevent oscillation, which were overlooked in the original calculation. The correct formula for the series spring constant is ultimately confirmed as (k1k2)/(k1+k2).
Winvoker555

Homework Statement


Two springs which have spring constant of k1 and k2 respectively are vertically hung in a series. Then, a mass m is attached to the end. Find the displacement and the spring constant of this series.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the displacement x1+x2 right (which is equal to mg/k1+mg/k2).
Then, I solved for the series constant by using the conservation of energy ,and let the two springs be my system.
ΔUs = Wext
ΔUs = mg⋅(x1+x2)
k(x1+x2)2 / 2 = mg(x1 + x2)
k(x1+x2) / 2 = mg
k = 2mg/(x1 + x2)

Since x1+x2 = mg / k1+mg / k2) ,then:
k = 2mg / (mg / k1 + mg / k2)
k = (2k1k2) / (k1+k2)

I checked the solution and this is not correct (the correct answer is (k1k2) / (k1+k2) );also, I know that the formula for spring constant of a series of two springs is 1 / kseries = 1 / k1 + 1 / k2. However, I can't figure out what I did wrong and what caused the extra 2 factor in the numerator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Winvoker555 said:

Homework Statement


Two springs which have spring constant of k1 and k2 respectively are vertically hung in a series. Then, a mass m is attached to the end. Find the displacement and the spring constant of this series.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the displacement x1+x2 right (which is equal to mg/k1+mg/k2).
Then, I solved for the series constant by using the conservation of energy ,and let the two springs be my system.
ΔUs = Wext
ΔUs = mg⋅(x1+x2)
k(x1+x2)2 / 2 = mg(x1 + x2)
k(x1+x2) / 2 = mg
k = 2mg/(x1 + x2)

Since x1+x2 = mg / k1+mg / k2) ,then:
k = 2mg / (mg / k1 + mg / k2)
k = (2k1k2) / (k1+k2)

I checked the solution and this is not correct (the correct answer is (k1k2) / (k1+k2) );also, I know that the formula for spring constant of a series of two springs is 1 / kseries = 1 / k1 + 1 / k2. However, I can't figure out what I did wrong and what caused the extra 2 factor in the numerator.
Why do you calculate the new spring constant from conservation of mechanical energy ? If you connect a mass to the end of the new spring and let it go, both the kinetic energy and the elastic energy of the spring would change.
Use simply the definition of spring constant K=F/Δx=mg/(x1+x2).
 
  • Like
Likes Winvoker555
ehild said:
Why do you calculate the new spring constant from conservation of mechanical energy ? If you connect a mass to the end of the new spring and let it go, both the kinetic energy and the elastic energy of the spring would change.
Use simply the definition of spring constant K=F/Δx=mg/(x1+x2).

Thank you very much for pointing that out. I used conservation of mechanical energy because the problem stated that the system is stationary ,and I thought that I can solve for k this way. However, I now realize that if a mass m is hung at the end of the springs, there has to be an additional force acting on it to stop the oscillation ,and that will caused additional external work that I didn't include in my equation.
 
Winvoker555 said:
Thank you very much for pointing that out. I used conservation of mechanical energy because the problem stated that the system is stationary ,and I thought that I can solve for k this way. However, I now realize that if a mass m is hung at the end of the springs, there has to be an additional force acting on it to stop the oscillation ,and that will caused additional external work that I didn't include in my equation.
You are right now. :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
24K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K