Spring damper system equation of motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a spring-damper system involving a 10 kg block displaced 20 mm and a damping coefficient of 100 N.s/m. Participants are exploring how many cycles the system will execute before the amplitude is reduced to 1 mm or below, given a spring stiffness of 20000 N/m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the energy dynamics of the system, including kinetic and potential energy relationships. There are attempts to derive the equation of motion and questions about the relevance of the Q factor in determining the system's behavior. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of moving the mass to an inner radius and the meaning of certain variables.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning assumptions. Some have provided insights into the Q factor and energy relationships, while others are seeking clarification on how to apply these concepts to find the time at which the amplitude falls below a specific threshold.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of damping in harmonic oscillators, with some uncertainty about the system's damping status (underdamped, critically damped). There is also a focus on the relationship between energy loss and amplitude reduction, with various interpretations being explored.

btnsteve
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 10 kg block is displaced 20 mm and released. If damping coefficient is 100 N.s/m,
how many cycles will be executed before amplitude is reduced to 1 mm or below? The stiffness
of the spring is k=20000 N/m.

f0zs77.png


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I first moved the mass to the inner radius and equated the Kinetic Energy of the system.
Ke1 = Ke2
Where i found m2 is 4m1

Next i equated the kinetic energy of the system and equated that to :
\frac{1}{2}*m_{eq}*v^{2}
\frac{1}{2}*m_{2}v^{2} + \frac{1}{2}I\frac{V^{2}}{r^{2}}= \frac{1}{2}* m_{eq}*v^{2}
meq = m2 + \frac{I}{r^{2}} where m2is 4*m1

I then substituted the numbers in and found Meq= 190

Next to find the amplitude i found the damping ratio of the system
\zeta =\frac{c}{Cc}

Cc = 2*m*Wn
Wn = \sqrt{\frac{K}{M}}
Wn= \sqrt{\frac{20000}{190}} Wn = 10.26
Cc = 2(190) * (10.26) = 3899 ∴ \zeta = \frac{100}{3899}
\zeta = 0.0256
Under damped system E.O.M =
X(t) = e^{-\zeta*W_{n}*t} { x_{o}Cos(w_{d}t) + \frac{x^{.}+W_{n}*X_{0}}{w_{d}}*Sin(w_{d}t) }
I'm trying to find the t value that would make X(t) be less than 1mm, I'm not sure how i would do that without just picking random values of t, as the equation doesn't seem solvable just for t.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you move the mass to the inner radius and what is m2?
Anyway:
I'm trying to find the t value that would make X(t) be less than 1mm, I'm not sure how i would do that without just picking random values of t, as the equation doesn't seem solvable just for t.
Could the Q factor help you there?
 
I moved the mass to the inner radius i guess to simplify the system, honestly not sure, its the way I've been taught this semester to do it.

So if i had the original system the mass would be M1
But now I've moved it to the inner radius The mass is now M2
For it to still be the same \frac{1}{2}M1*V1^{2} = \frac{1}{2}M2*V2^{2}

Where V1 = \dot{\theta}2r
Where V2 = \dot{\theta}r
Therefore
\frac{1}{2}M1*(\dot{\theta}2r)^{2} = \frac{1}{2}M2*(\dot{\theta}r)^{2}
Through Cancelling 4M1 = M2

I'm not sure what the Q factor is
 
Still not 100% sure on this Q factor, hard to see how it applies without an example.

Q = \frac{1}{2\zeta}
Q = \frac{1}{2*0.0256} Q = 19.53

Q = 2\pi*\frac{Energy Stored}{Energy Lost Per Cycle}

\frac{Q}{2\pi} = \frac{Energy Stored}{Energy Lost Per Cycle}

3.11 = \frac{Energy Stored}{Energy Lost Per Cycle}


Can you give a hint at what the next step would be, would i find the energy at the start? By using
T(t) + V(t) = E, Where T is the kinetic energy and V is the potential, i guess at t = 0 there is no kinetic energy.

Therefore \frac{1}{2}kx_{0}^{2} = E(0)
 
How does the energy relate to the amplitude of the oscillations?
 
Well as the energy is lost the amplitude decreases starting off at a maximum I guess, so there must be a time where the amount of energy lost means the amplitude falls below 2mm, i mean if I multiply both sides by 3.18 I get that 3.18 x energy lost per cycle = energy stored, at first I thought that meant it oscillates for 3.18 cycles but thst seems too little when the damping is that small. I guess directly the potential energy at the start is converted into kinetic energy so energy is somewhat proportional to velocity squared so if I could find velocity I could find the time through equation of motion.
 
steve2510 said:
Well as the energy is lost the amplitude decreases starting off at a maximum I guess, so there must be a time where the amount of energy lost means the amplitude falls below 2mm,
Which means that you need to know how the amplitude related to the energy ... i.e. is it an inverse-square law?

so energy is somewhat proportional to velocity squared so if I could find velocity I could find the time through equation of motion.
You can do it more directly using potential energy ... all the kinetic energy ends up stored in the spring, and the energy stored in a spring is related to how far it is compressed ... which is what you want to know about.

When the amplitude is 2mm, then the system has lost a certain percentage of amplitude ... which relates to a certain percentage of energy, and you have an equation for the rate of energy loss with time.

You should check the extent of the damping though - is this underdamped, critically damped, what? And what does that mean for the general motion?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
895
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K