Spring deflection problem using energy equations

AI Thread Summary
At equilibrium, all forces acting on the system balance, leading to the equation mg - kd = 0, resulting in a deflection of d = 0.356 m. The discussion explores the use of energy equations to understand the connection between energy and kinematics, specifically through the equation mgd = (1/2)kd^2, which yields a larger deflection of d = 0.712 m. The confusion arises because while energy conservation can be applied, it does not account for the fact that at equilibrium, the mass is still influenced by gravity. The key takeaway is that at the equilibrium position, forces are balanced, but gravity continues to act, preventing the mass from remaining at that point indefinitely. The clarification emphasizes that equilibrium is a momentary state rather than a permanent condition.
ago01
Messages
46
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Given a box of mass 0.8kg how far is the spring compressed if the block is placed on the spring and does not oscillate? In other words, what is the compression of the spring at the equilibrium point of the block- spring system? The spring constant is 22 N/m.
Relevant Equations
mg, -kx
At the equilibrium position all forces are equal to 0 (they balance). So, naturally we:

mg - kd = 0

d = mg/k

d = 0.356 m

This is the correct answer, I believe. But I want to solve it using the energy equations because I am really trying to understand energy's connection to the rest of kinematics.

At the equilibrium position all forces are 0. But there is potential energy stored in the spring and the box, and to be at equilibrium these both must cancel. Let `d` be the deflection and the ground be the 0 potential plane. Place the bottom of the spring on the 0 potential plane.

So,

mgd = (1/2)kd^2

d = (2mg)/k

d= 0.712m

Which of course is a factor of 2 larger than the actual answer. I am confused, as I am lead to believe this would be solvable both ways (one using forces, one using energy). I have asked this to several people and they seem to immediately go to the d = mg/k solution, which is fine.

Is this solvable using conservation of energy or am I spinning my wheels for no reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can see that your energy reference point is: the spring is fully extended and the weight is placed on top of that.
The energy the will have three components: potential energy due to gravity equal -mgd, plus spring potential energy, equal to ##\frac 1 2 kd^2## and the kinetic energy ##\frac 1/2 m \dot d ^2##. Physically, when you start by placing the weight on top of the spring, you will get oscillation. The problem states, what is the position of the box at equilibrium, i.e. after the kinetic energy of the oscillations have dissipated.
At that time, the spring compression energy does not equal to the potential energy due to gravity.
 
Thank you for your reply. I think I see now why this doesn't work. To be clear, the reason is that at position d the mass is still off the ground, so it still has gravity pulling it back down towards earth. At the instant it is at d (equilibrium) all forces cancel. But this doesn't imply that gravity suddenly turns off. "Letting the simulation run" past d would show that the weight doesn't stop at that point, but rather keeps falling beyond the equilibrium point due to gravity. So the equilibrium point is just the place where, at that instant, all forces are balanced.

I think I get it. Thank you again.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top