Spring, Friction, Incline, Mass moving up a Ramp

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 2.1 kg package released from rest on a 45-degree inclined ramp, attached to a spring with a spring constant of 35 N/m. The discussion centers around the dynamics of the package as it moves up the incline, considering the effects of gravitational potential energy and friction, with coefficients of static and kinetic friction provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the conservation of energy equation, questioning how to incorporate spring and gravitational potential energy along with frictional forces. There is an exploration of how to find the speed of the package at the spring's equilibrium position and the maximum compression of the spring.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying their understanding of the energy transformations involved. Some have offered guidance on how to approach the calculations for both parts A and B, emphasizing the need to consider kinetic energy, potential energy, and frictional losses. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup and energy conservation are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions made regarding energy conservation and the role of friction in the system. Participants are also considering how to handle the transition from stretching to compressing the spring and the implications for their calculations.

twilos
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 2.1 kg is released from rest from the bottom of a 45 degree inclined ramp. The package is attached to an ideal spring K = 35 N/m that is attached to the top of the incline causing the package to be launched up the incline. The coefficients of friction between the package and the surface are Us = 0.35 and Uk = 0.25

When the package is released, the spring is elongated 1.3m from its equilibrium position just before going up the ramp.

A. What is the speed of the package when the spring reaches its equilibrium position on the way up?

B. What will be the maximum compress of the spring?

Homework Equations



Kf + Ui = Ki + Ui + Other forces

Fs = 1/2kx^2

Ug = mg(sin45)

Us = 1/2kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I been trying to figure out how to set up the problem because i am unsure where Uspring and Ugravity are replacing in the conservation of energy. But here i go:

Kf + Ui = Ki + Ui + Other forces

1/2mv^2 + mg(sin45) = 0 + 1/2kx^2 - fkD

(.5)(2.1kg)(v^2) + (2.1kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(sin 45) = (.5)(35 N/m)(1.3m)^2 - (0.25)(2.1kg)(9.8 m/2^2)(cos45)(1.3)

also once you get the vf from part A you can find Part B's maximum compress which is K by using conservation of energy and substituting vf in and solving for K correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for Part B where you find the maximum compress I believe i am wrong and your actually finding X which is the distance the spring is compressed. Therefore when you find Vf you substitute it back into the conservation of energy equation and solve for X or D which i used both. And there will probably be some quadractic equation?
 
twilos said:

Homework Statement


A 2.1 kg is released from rest from the bottom of a 45 degree inclined ramp. The package is attached to an ideal spring K = 35 N/m that is attached to the top of the incline causing the package to be launched up the incline. The coefficients of friction between the package and the surface are Us = 0.35 and Uk = 0.25

When the package is released, the spring is elongated 1.3m from its equilibrium position just before going up the ramp.

A. What is the speed of the package when the spring reaches its equilibrium position on the way up?

B. What will be the maximum compress of the spring?

Homework Equations



Kf + Ui = Ki + Ui + Other forces

Fs = 1/2kx^2

Ug = mg(sin45)

Us = 1/2kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I been trying to figure out how to set up the problem because i am unsure where Uspring and Ugravity are replacing in the conservation of energy. But here i go:

Kf + Ui = Ki + Ui + Other forces

1/2mv^2 + mg(sin45) = 0 + 1/2kx^2 - fkD

(.5)(2.1kg)(v^2) + (2.1kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(sin 45) = (.5)(35 N/m)(1.3m)^2 - (0.25)(2.1kg)(9.8 m/2^2)(cos45)(1.3)

also once you get the vf from part A you can find Part B's maximum compress which is K by using conservation of energy and substituting vf in and solving for K correct?
Welcome to PF.

Basically you are correct. Once you have the kinetic energy at the point that the spring is exerting no more force - changes from stretching to compression - then you use that kinetic energy to determine how much potential energy you can purchase and how much more friction will steal.
 
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

Basically you are correct. Once you have the kinetic energy at the point that the spring is exerting no more force - changes from stretching to compression - then you use that kinetic energy to determine how much potential energy you can purchase and how much more friction will steal.

Just to clarify, that was all for part A right? Now to find the max compression of the spring do i keep all the variables still i.e kinetic, potential gravitational, potential spring, friction? And do i solve for k or x/D?
 
twilos said:
Just to clarify, that was all for part A right? Now to find the max compression of the spring do i keep all the variables still i.e kinetic, potential gravitational, potential spring, friction? And do i solve for k or x/D?

I was referring to part B.

In A you have the PE of the spring being spent up until equilibrium on the PE increase, the KE increase and the expense of friction.

In B then it's the KE going back into Spring PE and gravity PE and the expense of friction.

As to solving, then of course it's x that you solve for since k is the same either way for the ideal spring.
 
Awesome i actually understood the concept now... =) so we're splitting Part A into the Before and Part B into the After. And Part B will be looked at again with the conservation of energy as "the KE going back into Spring PE and gravity PE and the expense of friction." correct?
 
twilos said:
Awesome i actually understood the concept now... =) so we're splitting Part A into the Before and Part B into the After. And Part B will be looked at again with the conservation of energy as "the KE going back into Spring PE and gravity PE and the expense of friction." correct?

That's the idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K