Spring, Mass , Dumper system. Dumper Value.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a problem related to a Spring-Mass-Damper system, specifically focusing on the calculation of natural frequency and transmissibility. The user attempted to apply the transmissibility equation but faced challenges due to the unknown mass, which is essential for determining the system's natural frequency. The transmissibility was calculated to be 0.01%, indicating a required isolation of 99.9%. The user also explored using the dynamic equation cx' + kx = M x'', but the absence of mass remains a critical issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Spring-Mass-Damper systems
  • Familiarity with transmissibility equations
  • Knowledge of dynamic equations in mechanical systems
  • Basic principles of resonance in oscillatory systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of natural frequency in Spring-Mass-Damper systems
  • Learn about the implications of damping coefficients on system behavior
  • Study methods for estimating mass in dynamic systems
  • Explore resonance conditions and their effects on system performance
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, students studying dynamics, and professionals involved in vibration analysis and control systems will benefit from this discussion.

Bluesky1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Spring, Mass , Damper system. Damper Value.

Homework Statement



Hi,

I have a problem with first question from site below:
http://engineeronadisk.com/V2/notes_courses/engineeronadisk-91.html#pgfId-521824




The Attempt at a Solution



I was trying to solve it using transmissibility equation but there is no mass so I can't find a natural frequency.

Transmissibility is in this case 0.01% because the isolation required is 99.9%.

T= sqrt {[1+4*d^2*(f/f0)^2]/[(1-(f/f0)^2)^2 + 4*d^2*(f/f0)^2]}

d- damper value
f- frequency which is 100Hz
f0- natural frequency

The other way is to use dynamic equation and then find transfer function:

dynamic equation: cx' + kx = M x''

but the Mass is unknown and it's the problem.

Please help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you are correct - you need the mass, and there is no way to absorb it into the value of the damping coefficient. I guess you could proceed by assuming some convenient value for the mass.
 
Gokul43201 said:
I believe you are correct - you need the mass, and there is no way to absorb it into the value of the damping coefficient. I guess you could proceed by assuming some convenient value for the mass.

Thanks for answer,

The other way that i was trying to assume that system is in resonance because of low damper value, but 100Hz of forcing frequency doesn't need to be natural frequency.:(

First question when I have started to practice and I found without enough data.

Ehhh I'm lucky :cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
997
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K