1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Mind blown by mechanical systems (2nd order)

  1. Feb 1, 2013 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    B, K, M

    2. Relevant equations

    1. xs(t) -----spring ----mass-----damper-----fixed, derive DE for x of mass


    given :2. F - > M -----spring-------damper ---- fixed in series, derive the DE for velocity of spring


    3. The attempt at a solution


    1. ma = -k(x-xs) - B(v)

    But I don't understand, why aren't we taking the natural length of the spring into account?



    2. no idea, I have the solution and it says that damping force is B(v(t) - vk) , but I have no idea what v has anything to do with damper, the relative velocity vb should just be vk - 0 to me but the textbook and the hw solution suggest otherwise.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 1, 2013 #2

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Velocity relative to what? You haven't said what "vk" means.
     
  4. Feb 1, 2013 #3

    I do believe I understand what a damper is, but if you look at my system (indicated in series). I can't see what v(t) of mass has anything to do with the damper.

    since the damping force = B(relative velocity between each end)

    in this case, right end is fixed, left end is the spring's velocity, so I just can't see why Damping force fb which is equal to fk in this case is not B(vk).
     
  5. Feb 1, 2013 #4

    oh gosh....maybe that's the key, my TA didn't say anything about the reference frame of the velocity, and multiple times they have displacement that have different references...


    but i do believe v is the velocity of mass relative to the inertial frame of wall. and vk should be the spring velocity of the spring(right hand side of spring, left hand side of damper) relative to the inertia frame of the wall.
     
  6. Feb 1, 2013 #5
    Got it! vk is actually just v of the right side of spring - vm. so that makes sense that vm cancel out.


    but the reason why they used vk is because they want to replace it with the elemental equation 1/k * dfk/dt in the de to develop a 2nd order differential equation for the velocity.

    thanks HallsofIvy.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Mind blown by mechanical systems (2nd order)
Loading...