Spring-Mass System: Treating 2 Identical Springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter colonel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the treatment of two identical springs in a spring-mass system, specifically addressing their configuration in series versus parallel. When two identical springs are arranged in series, the effective spring constant is halved, resulting in K = k/2, where k is the spring constant of each individual spring. Conversely, when the springs are placed in parallel, their spring constants add up, leading to an effective spring constant of K = k + k = 2k. The relationship between force, displacement, and spring constants is established through Hooke's Law and the principles of energy conservation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its equation F = kx
  • Knowledge of spring constants and their behavior in series and parallel configurations
  • Basic principles of mechanics, particularly force and displacement relationships
  • Familiarity with energy conservation in mechanical systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation of effective spring constants for various spring configurations
  • Learn about the implications of spring constants in dynamic systems
  • Investigate the effects of damping and oscillation in spring-mass systems
  • Study real-world applications of spring-mass systems in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of spring-mass systems and their applications in real-world scenarios.

colonel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, in a simple spring-mass system consisting of two identical springs, how would you treat the springs? Would Hookes equation be F = kx + kx?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are they in series or parallel?
 
Tides point is that if you attach two identical springs end to end, effectively you still have just one spring (of twice the length) still with spring constant k.

If you have two identical springs side by side (and both attached to the mass) then the act identically and then you can add them.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Tides point is that if you attach two identical springs end to end, effectively you still have just one spring (of twice the length) still with spring constant k.

If you have two identical springs side by side (and both attached to the mass) then the act identically and then you can add them.

Exactly - except - the spring constant of a spring varies inversely with its length! This means that placing two identical springs in series you now have a single spring with half the effective spring constant.

To see this, consider two spring with constants k_1 and k_2. Since the springs exert identical forces on each other we have k_1 \Delta x_1 = k_2 \Delta x_2 where the \Delta's measure the compression or expansion of each spring. Also, \Delta x_1 + \Delta x_2 = x the displacement of the combined spring.

The force exerted by the combined spring is -k_2 \Delta x_2 and using the relations above you can see that F = - \frac {k_1 k_2}{k_1+k_2} x
 
Let us hang a mass M from spring 1: so, k1 x1=Mg.
Let us hang a mass M from spring 2: so, k2 x2=Mg.

If we hang the mass M from the springs arranged in series,
we have an effective spring with spring constant K and displacement X=x1+x2.
Since KX=Mg, we find
x1 = KX/k1 and
x2 = KX/k2.

By adding,
X=x1+x2=KX(1/k1 + 1/k2)
or
K=(1/k1 + 1/k2)-1

When k1=k=k2, we have K=k/2.

Edit:
Here's a quick proof using force and energy (instead of displacement).
k1 x12/2+k2 x22/2=KX2/2.
That is,
(k1 x1)2/k1+(k2 x2)2/k2=(KX)2/K.
Since KX=k1 x1=k2 x2 for springs in series,
(1/k1+1/k2)=1/K.
 
Last edited:
robphy said:
Let us hang a mass M from spring 1: so, k1 x1=Mg.
Let us hang a mass M from spring 2: so, k2 x2=Mg.

If we hang the mass M from the springs arranged in series,
we have an effective spring with spring constant K and displacement X=x1+x2.
Since KX=Mg, we find
x1 = KX/k1 and
x2 = KX/k2.
What if the springs aren't hanging but are placed horizontally?

Why is this: "The force exerted by the combined spring is -k_2 \Delta x_2" ? Wouldn't the other spring also play a role?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K