Spring - Pulley - Mass <Oscilations problem>

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a mass attached to a string connected to a spring, focusing on oscillation frequency. The context includes parameters such as moment of inertia, radius, spring constant, and assumptions like inextensibility of the string and negligible mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the total energy in the system and its components, questioning the justification for certain assumptions about motion and the relationship between height and displacement. There are attempts to derive expressions for frequency and concerns about the missing variable hmax. Some participants suggest alternative approaches, such as using force instead of energy.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem with various interpretations being discussed. Some participants have provided guidance on the use of energy considerations versus force, while others are questioning the necessity of defining all variables clearly. No explicit consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of the variable hmax and discuss the implications of this missing information on the problem-solving process. There is also mention of the kinetic energy of the mass needing to be included in the energy equation.

SqueeSpleen
Messages
138
Reaction score
5
We have a mass M attached to a string.
In the other extreme of the string we have a spring.
We know the moment of inertia of the alloy I, and it's radius R.
We know the constant of the spring k.

The string is inextensible. String mass is negligible. There's not friction. There's no slipping. What's the frequence of the oscilation?

Attemp:
I know that the total energy in the system is:

[itex]U = h g m + \frac{1}{2} I \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k x^{2}[/itex]
As the string is inextensible, we have [itex]\Delta h = \Delta x \Leftrightarrow h-x = c[/itex]
Then, when h is at it's maximum x is at it's minimum. Also [itex]\omega = 0[/itex] at this time.
Then, by taking the following system of reference:
[itex]0 = h_{min}[/itex] and [itex]0 = x_{max}[/itex] we have that
[itex]x_{min} = -h_{max}[/itex]
[itex]\omega_{max}[/itex] is reached when [itex]h = \frac{h_{min}+h_{max}}{2} = \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex]. (Is this fine? How do I justify this? I'm guessing this movement is some of trigonometric function that's why I asserted that).
Then, as [itex]\nu = \frac{h_{max}-h_{min}}{4 \pi} \frac{1}{\omega_{max} R}[/itex]
Due to the fact that [itex](a sin(b t))'= ab \frac{\nu}{2 \pi} cos(b t)[/itex], then the maximum less the minimum of one, divided by the other gives us [itex]\nu[/itex]

Now, as in our system of references we have:
[itex]U = h g m[/itex] when [itex]h=h_{max}[/itex] and when [itex]h \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex] we have:
[itex]U = \frac{h_{max}}{2} g m + \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
Then [itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} gm - \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big)^{2} k = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4}) = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} = \omega[/itex]
Then
[itex]\nu = \dfrac{h_{max}}{4 \pi R \sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} }[/itex]
I recently noticed that [itex]h_{max}[/itex] isn't given.
How do I deduct it?

PD: Forgive the bad drawing, I'm not very good with sketches.
 

Attachments

  • Image.png
    Image.png
    869 bytes · Views: 652
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SqueeSpleen said:
We have a mass M attached to a string.
In the other extreme of the string we have a spring.
We know the moment of inertia of the alloy I, and it's radius R.
We know the constant of the spring k.

The string is inextensible. String mass is negligible. There's not friction. There's no slipping. What's the frequence of the oscilation?

Attemp:
I know that the total energy in the system is:

[itex]U = h g m + \frac{1}{2} I \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k x^{2}[/itex]
As the string is inextensible, we have [itex]\Delta h = \Delta x \Leftrightarrow h-x = c[/itex]
Then, when h is at it's maximum x is at it's minimum. Also [itex]\omega = 0[/itex] at this time.
Then, by taking the following system of reference:
[itex]0 = h_{min}[/itex] and [itex]0 = x_{max}[/itex] we have that
[itex]x_{min} = -h_{max}[/itex]
[itex]\omega_{max}[/itex] is reached when [itex]h = \frac{h_{min}+h_{max}}{2} = \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex]. (Is this fine? How do I justify this? I'm guessing this movement is some of trigonometric function that's why I asserted that).
Then, as [itex]\nu = \frac{h_{max}-h_{min}}{4 \pi} \frac{1}{\omega_{max} R}[/itex]
Due to the fact that [itex](a sin(b t))'= ab \frac{\nu}{2 \pi} cos(b t)[/itex], then the maximum less the minimum of one, divided by the other gives us [itex]\nu[/itex]

Now, as in our system of references we have:
[itex]U = h g m[/itex] when [itex]h=h_{max}[/itex] and when [itex]h \frac{h_{max}}{2}[/itex] we have:
[itex]U = \frac{h_{max}}{2} g m + \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
Then [itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} gm - \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big)^{2} k = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4}) = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} = \omega[/itex]
Then
[itex]\nu = \dfrac{h_{max}}{4 \pi R \sqrt{\frac{h_{max}}{I} (gm-\frac{h_{max}}{4})} }[/itex]
I recently noticed that [itex]h_{max}[/itex] isn't given.
How do I deduct it?

PD: Forgive the bad drawing, I'm not very good with sketches.
Don't forget the kinetic energy of the mass.

attachment.php?attachmentid=70875&d=1403712506.png
 
Thanks!
Then... it's something like this?
[itex]U = \frac{h_{max}}{2} g m + \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k + \frac{1}{2} I \omega^{2} <br /> + \frac{1}{2} m R^{2} \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{h_{max}}{2} gm - \big( \frac{1}{2} \frac{h_{max}}{2}\big) ^{2} k = (\frac{1}{2} I + \frac{1}{2} m R^{2}) \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\dfrac{h_{max} ( gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k)}{I+mR^{2}} = ( I + m R^{2}) \omega^{2}[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{\dfrac{h_{max} ( gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k)}{I+mR^{2}}} = \omega[/itex]

[itex]\nu = \frac{h_{max}}{4 \pi} \sqrt{\dfrac{I+mR^{2}}{h_{max} ( gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k)} } = \frac{1}{4 \pi} \sqrt{\dfrac{h_{max}(I+mR^{2})}{ gm - \frac{h_{max}^{2}}{4} k} }[/itex]
 
It's the following expression which needs the kinetic energy of the mass added.
SqueeSpleen said:
[itex]U = h g m + \frac{1}{2} I \omega ^{2} + \frac{1}{2} k x^{2}[/itex]

In the end, the frequency is independent of hmax.

You really need to define all of your variables.


Is there a particular reason to do the problem using energy rather than force?
 
I tought it would be easier, only that =/ but now I think energy isn't the right approach.
 
This would depend a bit on how you do it. If using Lagrange mechanics (which I would apply by default to problems of this type), energy considerations are the way to go. In the end, the result should of course be independent of how you do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K