Spring Scale Problem: Finding Time w/ Force & Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter DrDanger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale Spring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a 1.5 kg object to travel 2.7 m under a constant force of 1.3 N using a spring scale. The user correctly identifies the need to apply Newton's second law (F=ma) to find acceleration and subsequently uses the kinematic equation \(\Delta X = V_0 t + 0.5 a t^2\) to solve for time. The calculated time of 2.49 seconds is questioned, indicating a need for verification. Additionally, the user inquires about determining the spring constant (k) using Hooke's Law (F=kx).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations
  • Knowledge of Hooke's Law (F=kx)
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Verify the calculation of time using the kinematic equation with proper substitution
  • Learn about the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in physics
  • Explore methods to calculate the spring constant (k) using experimental data
  • Study the implications of frictionless surfaces on motion and force applications
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in practical applications of force and motion principles.

DrDanger
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You use a spring scale to pull a 1.5 kg object on a horizontal frictionless surface with a constant horizontal force of 1.3 N (according to the scale reading). You use a stopwatch to time how long it takes the object, starting from rest, to cover a distance of 2.7 m. What is the reading of the stopwatch?

Homework Equations


F=-KX
F=ma
\Delta X=volt+.5aT^2

The Attempt at a Solution


So I did a=F/m to get the acceleration then plugged that into \Delta X=volt+.5aT^2 and Vo is equal to 0. After i plugged it all in I got 2.49, is that right? For some reason it seems wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On a side note, is possible to find k using f=kx?
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K