Square of the difference of four-vectors

  • #1
What is the correct way to expand (p3-p4)2 where p3 and p4 are 4-vectors, with metric gmu nu=diag[1,-1,-1,-1], p = [wp, p], where p is 3-vector, and wp= (p2+m2)(1/2)
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
Do you know how to take the dot product of two vectors when the metric isn't trivial? (If I'm allowed to phrase it that way.)
 
  • #3
p3.p4 = (p30, p3) . (p40, p4)

and p30= wp3 etc.
 
  • #4
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
And do you know how to expand that? In Euclidean 3-space ##\vec a.\vec b=a_xb_x+a_yb_y+a_zb_z##. Do you know the equivalent Minkowski 4-space expression?
 
  • #5
And do you know how to expand that? In Euclidean 3-space ##\vec a.\vec b=a_xb_x+a_yb_y+a_zb_z##. Do you know the equivalent Minkowski 4-space expression?
p3.p4 = = p30 p40 - p3.p4
 
  • #6
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
Right. So when you replace the vector with a difference of two vectors what do you get?
 
  • #7
Right. So when you replace the vector with a difference of two vectors what do you get?
The question is
(p3 - p4)^2 - whether it is (wp3-wp4)2 + (p3 - p4)2

or is it

(wp3+wp4)2 - (p3 + p4)2

Hmmmmmm.....what do I get?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
32,571
11,107
.what do I get?
Instead of guessing, write it out explicitly: ##(p_3 - p_4)^2 = (p_3 - p_4) \cdot (p_3 - p_4)##, and then just expand out the product and do the algebra.
 
  • #9
Instead of guessing, write it out explicitly: ##(p_3 - p_4)^2 = (p_3 - p_4) \cdot (p_3 - p_4)##, and then just expand out the product and do the algebra.
How would you write out (p3 - p4)?

There's a bit of subtlety here, and not guessing, see for e.g. Equation 46.29 here
 
  • #10
jtbell
Mentor
15,722
3,858
How would you write out (p3 - p4)?
You don't need to do that. The 4-vector product distributes over addition and subtraction just like the ordinary scalar product does.
 
  • #12
PAllen
Science Advisor
8,258
1,513
How would you write out (p3 - p4)?

There's a bit of subtlety here, and not guessing, see for e.g. Equation 46.29 here
First, vector subtraction against an orthonormal basis is always just what you would expect.

Second, you don't need to do this anyway because dot product distributes over vector addition/subtraction.
 
  • #13
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
The question is
(p3 - p4)^2 - whether it is (wp3-wp4)2 + (p3 - p4)2

or is it

(wp3+wp4)2 - (p3 + p4)2

Hmmmmmm.....what do I get?
You wrote down an expression for the dot product of two vectors in terms of the components. So if the vectors, instead of ##p_3## and ##p_4##, are both ##p##, and ##p=p_3-p_4## what do you get?
 
  • #14
You do realize that that equation answers the question you just asked?
Actually, you may not realize, there might be a surprise on the way!
 
  • #15
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
Actually, you may not realize, there might be a surprise on the way!
Perhaps it would be helpful if you either completed the algebra we've been discussing or said what you think is wrong with 4.29 in the pdf you linked.
 
  • #16
Perhaps it would be helpful if you either completed the algebra we've been discussing or said what you think is wrong with 4.29 in the pdf you linked.
The link provided may be using a different convention. Until now, I have provided all the algebra and the question. It was suggested that "...realize that the link you provided...has the solution...?" The original question has two alternatives, and it is useful to see what the forum members come up with. This is not a homework that is to be submitted to the forum in all its completeness, for it to be graded.
 
  • #17
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
The link provided may be using a different convention. Until now, I have provided all the algebra and the question. It was suggested that "...realize that the link you provided...has the solution...?" The original question has two alternatives
You mean your expressions in #7? Neither appears to be correct, as PeterDonis said in #8. How did you get them? I haven't tried to replicate 4.29 from your link, but it looks plausible at a quick glance.
 
  • #18
PAllen
Science Advisor
8,258
1,513
The link provided may be using a different convention. Until now, I have provided all the algebra and the question. It was suggested that "...realize that the link you provided...has the solution...?" The original question has two alternatives, and it is useful to see what the forum members come up with. This is not a homework that is to be submitted to the forum in all its completeness, for it to be graded.
The issue is that for everyone who has responded on this thread so far, your problem is trivial, yet you seem to have misunderstandings. We feel it is much more useful to help you resolve these than simply give you the answer.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and berkeman
  • #19
PAllen
Science Advisor
8,258
1,513
You mean your expressions in #7? Neither appears to be correct, as PeterDonis said in #8. How did you get them? I haven't tried to replicate 4.29 from your link, but it looks plausible at a quick glance.
I did replicate that equation, just doing the algebra in my head.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #20
Ibix
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2020 Award
7,306
6,386
I did replicate that equation, just doing the algebra in my head.
Thank you. I was confident up to sign errors on the cross terms - it's been a long day...
 
  • #21
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
32,571
11,107
Until now, I have provided all the algebra
Have you done the algebra I asked for in post #8? If so, post it. If not, do it and post it.

The original question has two alternatives
Do you mean the question you asked in post #7? Neither of those alternatives is correct.

Now go do the algebra I asked you to do in post #8, so you can compute what the right answer is instead of guessing.

This is not a homework that is to be submitted to the forum in all its completeness, for it to be graded
No, but that doesn't mean we're just going to tell you an answer that you could derive for yourself by doing basic algebra. PF is not an oracle that you can feed guesses to and get yes/no answers back.
 
  • #22
Thank you. I was confident up to sign errors on the cross terms - it's been a long day...
Sorry, sign errors in which equation? By the way, the way it is derived in the link is not necessarily consistent.

What is the correct answer (of the alternatives posted)?
 
  • #23
PeterDonis
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
32,571
11,107
What is the correct answer (of the alternatives posted)?
Do the algebra yourself and find out what the correct answer is. As I said, PF is not an oracle.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes robphy and Ibix

Related Threads on Square of the difference of four-vectors

Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
971
Replies
22
Views
311
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Top