SR's Length Contraction and Time Dilation

  • Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date
  • #1
263
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

If an observer rotates a four dimensional object, the lengths of the object would change to the observer. If that same observer walks backwards, the lengths of the object will also appear to change from his frame. In fact, if either the observer or the object rotates or moves in any way, it will also appear to the observer that the object's lengths have changed. This is very similar to the effects of special relativity in our world.

Here's the question, is length contraction, time dilation, etc, actually just consequences of a fourth spatial dimension?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
5,428
291
I don't follow your logic, but we can only detect 3 spatial dimensions in any case. If there are others they must be microscopic and/or cyclic or we would could move around in them.

However Euclidean relativity introduces a fifth dimension, and all four dimensional things in the 5-space move at c, while all us 3d beings suffer the laws of SR.

See here www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=103977 for a discussion and some links.
 
  • #3
263
1
Yes, we can only detect three dimensions, the fourth is brought to us through contortions of our detected three, i.e. length contraction.
 
  • #4
5,428
291
I wish you would read beyond the first two sentences I wrote. They are merely cautionary because there is no evidence for extra dimensions.

Euclidean relativity theory, does exactly what you want, boosts become rotations into an extra spatial dimension, thus creating length contraction in the normal 3-space slice.

So the answer to your question is - yes it is possible to make a theory where this happens.
 
  • #5
DrGreg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,281
856
The fourth dimension isn't space, it's time.

A change of speed is the 4D-equivalent of a rotation in 4D spacetime. Length contraction and time dilation can be viewed as consequences of the rotation.

A rotation in 2D Euclidean space through angle [itex]\theta[/itex] can be written as

[tex]x' = x \cos \theta - y \sin \theta = \Gamma (x \, - \, V \, y) [/tex]
[tex] y' = y \cos \theta + x \sin \theta = \Gamma (y \, + \, V \, x) [/tex]​

where [itex]\Gamma = \cos \theta[/itex] and [itex]V = \tan \theta[/itex]. Compare this with the Lorentz transform

[tex]x' = \gamma ( x \, - \, (v/c) \, ct ) [/tex]
[tex] ct' = \gamma ( ct \, - \, (v/c) \, x ) [/tex]​

(I wouldn't get involved in "Euclidean relativity", as that is a somewhat contentious, non-mainstream topic.)
 

Related Threads on SR's Length Contraction and Time Dilation

  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
551
Top