Stability of a spring mass system in two dimensions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the stability of a spring-mass system in two dimensions, specifically addressing the potential energy expression derived from the system's configuration. The user is struggling with the equilibrium condition, noting that differentiating the potential energy with respect to x does not yield a solution, indicating a lack of a minimum point. They seek clarification on how to simplify the potential energy expression and the role of constants in the equations. The conversation emphasizes the use of approximation techniques to derive a more manageable form of the potential energy, highlighting the importance of understanding the constants involved in the equations. Overall, the thread provides insights into tackling complex spring-mass system problems in physics.
kyva1929
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Attached

Homework Equations



5.104 mentioned in the problem is

Also attached

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose the mass is moved to (x,y), the distance from the mass to the left spring is denoted by A, the distance from the mass to the right spring is denoted by B. I get the expression in the last line.

If I expand the whole expression, and treat sqrt((a+/-x)^2+y^2) as simply a (for small x and y, << a), I can obtain the potential energy in the form of 5.104 after eliminating certain constants, however, that doesn't help me in solving the eqm part of the question.

Differentiating the expression with respect to x doesn't give a solution when the first derivative = 0, which would then indicate that there's no minimum point. I'm stuck. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Qs.jpg
    Qs.jpg
    35.2 KB · Views: 600
Physics news on Phys.org
Then I would like to see how you obtain the simplified expression for U :smile:

My result is: U = k(a-l_o)^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})x^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})y^2

Why does \partial U/\partial x = 0 not give any solution?
 
hikaru1221 said:
Then I would like to see how you obtain the simplified expression for U :smile:

My result is: U = k(a-l_o)^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})x^2 + k(1-\frac{l_o}{a})y^2

Why does \partial U/\partial x = 0 not give any solution?

Can you show me how you arrive at the expression for U? I've tried to derive U from force consideration, the resulting expression looks way too complicated. The expression obtained by merely adding the potential energy from both springs is still too complicated as well.

Thanks for your help :)
 
From your exact expression of U:

U = \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2 + \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2

We have:

U = k(a^2+x^2+y^2+l_o^2-2l_o(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}))

Notice that:

\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1+\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1-\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

(due to a\sqrt{1+\epsilon} \approx a(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}) )

And we arrive at the result.
 
hikaru1221 said:
From your exact expression of U:

U = \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2 + \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2

We have:

U = k(a^2+x^2+y^2+l_o^2-2l_o(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}))

Notice that:

\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1+\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1-\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

(due to a\sqrt{1+\epsilon} \approx a(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}) )

And we arrive at the result.

Thank you so much! I'm a newbie and am still not used to approximation technique, thanks for the great help!
 
hikaru1221 said:
From your exact expression of U:

U = \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2 + \frac{1}{2}k(\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}-l_o)^2

We have:

U = k(a^2+x^2+y^2+l_o^2-2l_o(\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2}))

Notice that:

\sqrt{a^2+2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1+\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

\sqrt{a^2-2ax+x^2+y^2} \approx a(1-\frac{x}{a}+\frac{x^2}{2a^2}+\frac{y^2}{2a^2})

(due to a\sqrt{1+\epsilon} \approx a(1 + \frac{\epsilon}{2}) )

And we arrive at the result.
why did you not treat the constant k as, kx and ky??
Can you combine them like that? because i thought that the problem statement given has them as separate constants? help me please
 
i have this as the exact same question. i was wondering if i could get some clarification on the two different k constants. what is the next step?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K