Stability of Crank-Nicholson method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Stability
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the stability of the Crank-Nicholson method in numerical analysis, particularly focusing on the condition involving the spectral radius of the matrix product A^-1 B. Participants are exploring the implications of this condition for the stability of the method when applied to certain equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to define the matrices A and B clearly and are questioning the necessity of proving the stability condition. There is exploration of the finite difference matrices and their forms, as well as the implications of eigenvalue decomposition on the stability analysis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the mathematical structure of the problem and raising questions about the correctness of their assumptions and formulations. Some participants suggest that the stability condition leads to an understanding of how eigenvalues affect the system's behavior over time.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the specific equations being analyzed and whether the derived forms of matrices A and B are appropriate for the problem at hand. Participants are also considering the implications of raising eigenvalues to large powers in the context of stability.

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


If p(A^-1 B) < 1 then the Crank-Nicholson method is stable for all eigenvalues.Where p is the spectral radius.

Homework Equations


Stability requires that A*U_j=B*U_{j-1} which gives
U_j = A^-1 B U_{j-1}

The Attempt at a Solution



Where do I start?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nusc said:
Where do I start?
By defining A,B, and the problem more clearly. Are you saying you need to prove that if p(A^-1 B)<1, then the Crank-Nicholson method applied to some equation involving A and B is stable?
 
Yes.
So for A*U_j = B*U_{j-1} we have:
The finite difference matrix for A:

1+lamda -lamda/2 ... 0
-lamda/2 1+lamda ... 0
0 ...
... -lamda/2
0 ... -lamda/2 1+lamda

Some tridiagonal matrix.
Similarly for B
B:

1-lamda +lamda/2 ... 0
+lamda/2 1-lamda ... 0
0 ...
... +lamda/2
0 ... +lamda/2 1-lamda

This is in general. I'm not sure if this is correct because I assume we need to do it for another problem.
 
If your equation is
[tex]Au_j = Bu_{j-1}[/tex],
then
[tex]u_j = A^{-1}Bu_{j-1}[/tex]
and
[tex]u_{j+1} = A^{-1}Bu_{j}= \left(A^{-1}B\right)A^{-1}Bu_{j-1}[/tex],
and
[tex]u_{j+2} = A^{-1}Bu_{j-1}u_{j+1} = \left(A^{-1}B\right)^3u_{j-1}[/tex].
You can continue this on forever to get the term after n steps as
[tex]u_{j+n} = \left(A^{-1}B\right)^{n+1}u_{j-1}[/tex].

Now factor A^{-1}B by eigenvalue decomposition to obtain
[tex]A^{-1}B = TDT^{-1}[/tex]
where D is a diagonal matrix containing the eigenvalues and T contains the corresponding eigenvectors.
Note that
[tex]\left(A^{-1}B\right)^2 = \left(TDT^{-1}\right)^2 = TDT^{-1}TDT^{-1}= TD^2T^{-1}[/tex]
And similarly,
[tex]\left( A^{-1}B \right)^n = TD^nT^{-1}[/tex]

Now if you plug this into the previous equation, you find that
[tex]u_{j+n} = \left(A^{-1}B\right)^{n+1}u_{j-1} = TD^{n+1}T^{-1}u_{j-1}[/tex]

The system is stable if the solution u_{j+n} is bounded for all n. Since D is a diagonal matrix, D^{n+1} is just the diagonal elements raised to the n+1th power. So what happens if a number bigger than one is raised to a large power? And what about when the number is smaller than one? This is why you have the condition on the size of the eigenvalues.
 
If a number bigger than one is raised to a large power, then the system will become unstable.
If a number smaller than one is raised to a large power, then the system will become stable.

Hence the method is unconditionally stable.

Is that correct?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K