Standard corrections to GFE for uni and bi molecular rxns

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of free energy changes in multi-step mechanisms involving unimolecular and bimolecular reactions. It emphasizes the necessity of converting gas phase free energies to a 1M standard state by incorporating the term RT*ln(RT). The participant confirms that in reactions where the number of moles changes, such as AB → A + B or B + C → D, the correction terms will not cancel out, affecting the delta G calculations by approximately three kcal/mol. The participant seeks clarification on predicting the sign of delta G based on mole counting in reactants and products.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of free energy changes in chemical reactions
  • Familiarity with the concept of standard states in thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of unimolecular and bimolecular reaction mechanisms
  • Experience with electronic structure programs for calculating free energies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of concentration changes on free energy calculations
  • Study the derivation and implications of the RT*ln(RT) term in thermodynamics
  • Explore advanced topics in reaction mechanisms involving multiple steps
  • Learn about the application of Gibbs free energy in biochemical reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, particularly those specializing in thermodynamics, reaction mechanisms, and computational chemistry, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for researchers involved in modeling chemical reactions in solution.

Einstein Mcfly
Messages
161
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone. I have a weird question regarding the calculation of free energy changes in a multi-step mechanism. Now, if you have a bunch of calculated free energies in gas phase at 1 atm (say, from an electronic structure program) and you want to model in solvent, you need to get them in a 1M standard state and this requires adding an additional term RT*ln(RT). Now, if every step in your mechanism is either unimolecular or bimolecular, there will be no change in the concentration of anything as the total number of moles of things will all stay constant and these corrections will all cancel when you calculate the delta Gs. However, if you have some mixing of them, such as
1) AB--> A +B
2) B+C->D
etc.
then in the first case you've added a mole and in the second case you've removed a mole. Therefore, when I calculate the delta G for these steps, the sign of RT*ln(RT) should be positive in the first case and negative in the second case, correct? You won't get cancellation when you calculate the delta Gs and these corrections will tweek things by three or so kcal/mol. Am I on the right track here or am I missing something?

Thanks for any help you can give.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
How can you predict the sign of delta G only by counting moles on the reactant side and product side?
 
Sorry, I'm not talking about getting the sign of delta G, I'm talking only about the correction in going from 1 atm to 1M. In that case delta G is the difference between the Gs at STP plus the difference between the correction terms for each G. Clearly the effect of the correction term will be zero if one mole goes to one mole or two moles go to two moles, but what about one mole going to two (as in A-->B+C) or two going to one (C+D-->F)?

I just want to make sure that I'm correct about when the correction term will figure in (that is, not cancel out).
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
166K