State of matter: Potential Energy - seperation graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy at absolute zero and equilibrium separation of atoms. It clarifies that potential energy is minimized when the resultant force between atoms is zero, which occurs at equilibrium separation. At absolute zero, while potential energy can be minimized, kinetic energy is not necessarily zero due to atomic vibrations. The conversation emphasizes that work must be done against attractive and repulsive forces to change atomic separation, resulting in changes to potential energy. Overall, the minimum potential energy corresponds to a state of equilibrium where forces balance, but kinetic energy remains present due to atomic motion.
Kurokari
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
The graph should look something like this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:12-6-Lennard-Jones-Potential.svg (the other information has nothing to do with what I ask though, only the shape of the graph for clarity sake)

My question is, does resultant force = 0, or when potential energy is minimum occur during absolute zero only, if so then what is the kinetic energy? Is kinetic energy maximum, or simply zero since it is absolute zero.

If I'm wrong about U = 0 occurring at absolute zero only please correct me.

My second question is, why is it that potential energy is minimum when at equilibrium seperation? Why not kinetic energy is minimum since at equilibrium, attractive force = repulsive force and the 2 particle is not moving?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the equilibrium separation the resultant force on an atom = zero.
To INCREASE the separation work must be done against the attraction force between atoms... this means an increase in potential energy
To DECREASE the separation work must be done against the force of repulsion between atoms... this also means an increase in potential energy.
So the minimum of potential energy is when the resultant force between atoms = zero.
At temperatures above absolute zero atoms are vibrating... they have vibrational KE.
They are not moving around like molecules in a gs which have TRANSLATIONAL KE
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top