State postulate for incompressible substance

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Signature
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incompressible State
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the state postulate for incompressible substances, particularly focusing on liquids like water and solids. Participants explore the requirements for defining the thermodynamic state of these substances and question the significance of the state postulate in various contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the state postulate for a simple compressible system is defined by two independent intensive properties, questioning how this applies to incompressible systems.
  • Others propose that when considering incompressible systems, particularly liquids like water, the definition of thermodynamic equilibrium may still require two intensive properties despite water's compressibility.
  • One participant emphasizes that in fluid mechanics, water is often treated as incompressible, raising questions about the basic properties needed to specify the state of an incompressible substance.
  • Another participant mentions that the Poynting Correction is relevant for real gases, but questions its applicability to incompressible substances.
  • A later reply indicates that for homogeneous isotropic single-phase solids, two intensive variables are still necessary to define the state, and notes that Hooke's law incorporates compressibility in its relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the compressibility of liquids and the relevance of the state postulate for incompressible substances. There is no consensus on the importance of the state postulate for incompressible systems or the specific properties required to define their state.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight that while water is often treated as incompressible in fluid mechanics, it is fundamentally compressible, which complicates the discussion of the state postulate. The applicability of concepts like the Poynting Correction to incompressible substances remains unresolved.

Signature
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
State postulate for a simple compressible system is completely specified by two independent intensive properties.
But what about state postulate for a incompressible system.
Why it is not so important?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Signature said:
State postulate for a simple compressible system is completely specified by two independent intensive properties.
But what about state postulate for a incompressible system.
Why it is not so important?
Please identify what you consider an incompressible system.
 
Chestermiller said:
Please identify what you consider an incompressible system.
just considering only liquids specifically water
 
Signature said:
just considering only liquids specifically water
Liquid water is compressible, so it still takes specification of two intensive properties to define its thermodynamic equilibrium state. See the phase diagram for water.
 
Chestermiller said:
Liquid water is compressible, so it still takes specification of two intensive properties to define its thermodynamic equilibrium state. See the phase diagram for water.

Let it be, but, in most cases especially fluid mechanics we treat water as an incompressible liquid. Anyway if there is an incompressible substance, what are the basic properties which are required to completely specify its state. Why no textbooks did mention about the state postulate of incompressible substances?
 
Signature said:
Let it be, but, in most cases especially fluid mechanics we treat water as an incompressible liquid. Anyway if there is an incompressible substance, what are the basic properties which are required to completely specify its state. Why no textbooks did mention about the state postulate of incompressible substances?
It's certainly mentioned in thermodynamics books. Look up Poynting Correction.

Chet
 
Signature said:
But Poynting correction is for real gases. But I want to know about incompressible substance.
I'm sure you are aware that there is no such thing as a completely incompressible liquid.
 
Chestermiller said:
It's certainly mentioned in thermodynamics books. Look up Poynting Correction.

Chet
Ok sir. Then what about the state postulate for solids
 
Signature said:
Ok sir. Then what about the state postulate for solids
How can we define the state of solids
 
  • #10
For homogeneous isotropic single phase solids, two intensive variables are still required. Incidentally, for solids, Hooke's law in 3D automatically has compressibility built into the relationship.

Chet
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K