I Statement about torque in a system of particles

AI Thread Summary
In a system of particles, it is possible to identify pairs of forces whose torque remains independent of the chosen reference point, as well as a force that passes through the reference point, resulting in zero torque. The discussion highlights that internal forces adhering to Newton's third law yield zero torque, reinforcing the independence of torque from the reference point. A couple, defined as two equal and opposite forces acting along different lines, produces a non-zero torque despite having a net force of zero. The torque can be expressed mathematically, showing that the difference in position vectors is independent of the reference point. Overall, understanding these concepts allows for effective summarization of forces and torques in a mechanical system.
SR_0301
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, I’m studying Newton’s Mechanics at the first year of engineering, and I would like to ask one question about torque. In my book I found this statement ‘’ Given a system of particles, it’s always possible to determine a pair of forces which torque is indipedent from the pole chosen, and also a force which pass through the pole ( so its torque is 0 respect to that pole ). Unfortunately there aren't examples or a scratch of demonstration of the statement. I think I got the first part about the two forces, but I'm still a bit confused about the true utility. I know the fact that the torque of internal forces which are compatible with Newton third law is zero, and that's practically a consequence of this statement (because the torque is zero indipendently from the pole)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two forces of equal magnitude that are opposite in direction and act along different lines are called a couple. Since they are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction they give a net force of zero, but a non-zero torque. This torque is independent from the reference point as, the torque is given by
$$
\vec \tau = \vec x_1 \times \vec F - \vec x_2 \times \vec F = (\vec x_1 - \vec x_2)\times \vec F
$$
and ##\vec x_1 - \vec x_2## is independent of the reference point.

You can summarize the forces acting on a system for any reference point by the total force, acting at that point, and a torque. If the total force is zero then the torque is independent of the reference point, if not it will change when you change reference. The total force is the same regardless of the reference point.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and vanhees71
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top