- #31
Andre
- 4,294
- 73
That's not the point. The point is that deductive reasoning appears to be death due to the far too popular inductive model approach.
We need less models and more thinking about the big picture. For instance, How are planets really behaving under the dynamics of orbital and spinning perturbations, being a complex multi layered complex gyroscope with brittle, ductile and fluid shells and test your ideas on paleo-evidence instead of gazing at the most unexplained behavior of the Earth and trying to explain it using only a limited scope of specialities and models, disregarding others.
Highly unlikely to solve that with sophisticated circulation models
We need less models and more thinking about the big picture. For instance, How are planets really behaving under the dynamics of orbital and spinning perturbations, being a complex multi layered complex gyroscope with brittle, ductile and fluid shells and test your ideas on paleo-evidence instead of gazing at the most unexplained behavior of the Earth and trying to explain it using only a limited scope of specialities and models, disregarding others.
Highly unlikely to solve that with sophisticated circulation models
Last edited: