Statement and Paleo climate problems.

Thread starter Andre
Start date May 23, 2007
Tags

Climate

Click For Summary

The discussion centers on skepticism regarding the interpretation of Greenland ice cores and their implications for understanding past climate conditions, particularly in relation to the existence of mammoths in Siberia. The original poster argues that the presence of mammoths during the Last Glacial Maximum contradicts current climate models, suggesting that these models are based on faulty interpretations of ice core data. They emphasize that significant temperature fluctuations indicated by ice cores may not accurately reflect historical conditions, proposing that isotope ratios in ice cores could be more indicative of humidity rather than temperature. The conversation also touches on the challenges of peer review in climate science, which can stifle alternative viewpoints. Overall, the thread raises questions about the validity of established climate narratives based on ice core analysis.

Jun 12, 2007

Andre

That's not the point. The point is that deductive reasoning appears to be death due to the far too popular inductive model approach.

We need less models and more thinking about the big picture. For instance, How are planets really behaving under the dynamics of orbital and spinning perturbations, being a complex multi layered complex gyroscope with brittle, ductile and fluid shells and test your ideas on paleo-evidence instead of gazing at the most unexplained behavior of the Earth and trying to explain it using only a limited scope of specialities and models, disregarding others.

Highly unlikely to solve that with sophisticated circulation models

Last edited: Jun 12, 2007