Static Equilibrium and reaction forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the reaction forces at support A for a J-shaped member in static equilibrium, subjected to a vertical force F of 1.60 k and a weight W of 5.50 k. The member's dimensions are specified as width w = 1.50, length l = 6.00, and height h = 2.00. The equilibrium equations used include Fx = 0, Fy = 0, and Fz = 0, leading to the calculation of tension T_DE, which was found to be 24.48. However, discrepancies arose when equating coefficients for the j component, indicating a potential oversight regarding the moment produced by the journal bearing at A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles
  • Familiarity with vector cross products
  • Knowledge of reaction forces in mechanical systems
  • Ability to apply equilibrium equations in three dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of moments in static equilibrium
  • Learn about journal bearings and their effects on reaction forces
  • Explore vector analysis in mechanical systems
  • Review the application of equilibrium equations in three-dimensional structures
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in structural analysis or static equilibrium problems will benefit from this discussion.

MAPgirl23
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Static Equilibrium... Please help

Homework Statement


The J-shaped member shown in the figure is supported by a cable DE and a single journal bearing with a square shaft at A. Determine the reaction forces and at support A required to keep the system in equilibrium. The cylinder has a weight = 5.50 , and F = 1.60 is a vertical force applied to the member at C. The dimensions of the member are w = 1.50 , l = 6.00 , and h = 2.00.

Homework Equations


Fx = 0
Fy = 0
Fz = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


W = -5.5 k
F = -1.6 k
Coordinates:
A(0,0,0); B(0,6,0); C(-1.5,6,0); D(-3,6,0); E(0,0,2)

Take moment about A:
(AD X T_DE) + (AB X W) + (AC X F) = 0 ...eqn 1

Position vector:
DE = 3i - 6j + 2k magnitude DE = 7
AB = 6j
AC = -1.5i + 6j
AD = -3i + 6j

Unit vector:
U_DE (3i - 6j + 2k)/7 = .43i-.86j+.29k

T_DE = T_DE(U_DE) = T_DE(.43i-.86j+.29k)

...eqn 1:
[(-3i+6j) X T_DE(.43i-.86j+.29k)] +[(6j) X (-5.5k)] + [(-1.5i+6j) X (-1.6k)] = 0

[T_DE(2.56k+.87j-2.58k+1.74i)] +[(-33i)]+ [(-2.4j-9.6i)] = 0

[T_DE(.87j+1.74i)] + [(-42.6i-2.4j)] = 0

Equating i coefficient to zero:
1.74T_DE - 42.6 = 0
T_DE = 24.48

From Equilibrium Condition:
F_z = 0
A_z + T_DE(.29) + W + F = 0
A_z + 24.48(.29) - 5.5 - 1.6 = 0
A_z + 7.1 - 5.5 - 1.6 = 0
A_z = 0

F_y = 0
A_y + T_DE(-.86) =0
A_y + 24.48(-.86) =0
A_y = 21.05

But it was wrong.
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 731
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
MAPgirl23 said:
[T_DE(.87j+1.74i)] + [(-42.6i-2.4j)] = 0

Equating i coefficient to zero:
1.74T_DE - 42.6 = 0
T_DE = 24.48

But if you equate the j coefficient to zero you will get a very different result for T_DE. So, something's wrong.

I believe you left out the unknown moment about A that is produced by the "journal bearing" at A.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K