Static equilibrium & force of friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a window cleaner and a ladder in static equilibrium, focusing on the forces acting on the ladder and the conditions for slipping. The scenario includes a ladder placed against a frictionless wall at an angle, with specific weights and a coefficient of static friction provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the normal force at the base of the ladder and its relation to the weights of the ladder and the cleaner. There is exploration of torque equations and their components, including the need to account for the mass of the man in the torque calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about forces and torques. Some have suggested drawing diagrams to clarify the situation, and there is recognition of the need to include multiple terms in the torque equation. Guidance has been offered regarding the setup of the equations, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the incorporation of the man's mass into the normal force and the calculation of static friction. The discussion reflects a learning process with various interpretations being explored.

janelle1905
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A window cleaner of mass 95 kg places a 22-kg ladder against a frictionless wall at an angle of 65 degrees with the horizontal. The ladder is 10m long and rests on a wet floor with a coefficient of static friction equal to 0.40. What is the maximum length that the window cleaner can climb before the ladder slips?


Homework Equations


T = rF


The Attempt at a Solution


Sin65 = opp/10, therefore opposite = 9.06
Cos65 = adj/10, therefore adjacent = 4.23
m = 22; M=95
Max Ffr = uFN = u(mg + Mg) = Fw
Fy=FN-mg-Mg
T=Fw(9.06)-mg(4.23/2)

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you know that the normal force (at the base of the ladder) will be equal to the combined weight of the ladder and man?
 
Hootenanny said:
How do you know that the normal force (at the base of the ladder) will be equal to the combined weight of the ladder and man?

I originally thought it would be equal to that because (mg + Mg) is the force exerted onto the ground ... but I see that my logic there is wrong.
Should it be an unknown?
Sorry, I am very lost with this question!
 
janelle1905 said:
I originally thought it would be equal to that because (mg + Mg) is the force exerted onto the ground ... but I see that my logic there is wrong.
Should it be an unknown?
Sorry, I am very lost with this question!
I would start by examining the turning moments about the top of the ladder, i.e. assume that the point where the ladder touches the wall is the pivot.
 
By turning moments, do you mean torque?
I thought this would be the correct eq'n for torque:
T=Fw(9.06)-mg(4.23/2)

And I know that T must equal 0 for the system to be at equilibrium.
 
janelle1905 said:
By turning moments, do you mean torque?
I thought this would be the correct eq'n for torque:
T=Fw(9.06)-mg(4.23/2)
Yes, I mean torques. What do each of those terms represent?
janelle1905 said:
And I know that T must equal 0 for the system to be at equilibrium.
Indeed, that is correct.
 
Hootenanny said:
Yes, I mean torques. What do each of those terms represent?

Because T=rF
T = Fw(9.06) - mg(4.23/2)
The first force is Fw (= force of wall)
9.06 is the height of the wall (i.e. where the ladder touches the wall)

The negative force, is given by F=mg
And r=4.23/2

I'm sorry that I am so confused by this question, but I appreciate your help a lot!
 
janelle1905 said:
Because T=rF
T = Fw(9.06) - mg(4.23/2)
The first force is Fw (= force of wall)
9.06 is the height of the wall (i.e. where the ladder touches the wall)

The negative force, is given by F=mg
And r=4.23/2
Ahh, I see, you are taking moments about the base of the ladder, rather than the top. No matter, since you are going to have to do both eventually. However, I think that you're forgetting one small thing ...
... what about the man?
janelle1905 said:
I'm sorry that I am so confused by this question, but I appreciate your help a lot!
No need to apologise, we wouldn't be here if students weren't asking for help! :smile:
 
Okay - so does the torque equation have to be re-written to include the mass of the man? And is that then the unknown?
 
  • #10
janelle1905 said:
Okay - so does the torque equation have to be re-written to include the mass of the man?
Indeed it does.
janelle1905 said:
And is that then the unknown?
Yes, that will be an unknown, but your also going to have another unknown: the reaction force from the wall.
 
  • #11
Okay...thanks for your help...and sorry for my delay in responding, but I still haven't had much success with this question.
I have the torque equation as:
T=FN(10)sin65-22(2.8)x1/2cos65=0
as well as: T=FNr=(95)(9.8)r

But I don't know how to incorporate the mass of the man into the normal force of the ladder (to calculate force of static friction).
 
  • #12
janelle1905 said:
Okay...thanks for your help...and sorry for my delay in responding, but I still haven't had much success with this question.
I have the torque equation as:
T=FN(10)sin65-22(2.8)x1/2cos65=0
as well as: T=FNr=(95)(9.8)r

But I don't know how to incorporate the mass of the man into the normal force of the ladder (to calculate force of static friction).
I'm not quite sure what your doing there, your torque equation should have three terms in it: one term for the weight of the ladder, one term of the weight of the man and one term for the normal reaction force of the ladder.

Try drawing a diagram of the situation. I'll help you out and write the torque equation if we take moments about the base of the ladder (i.e. we take the base of the ladder as the pivot).

F_N\ell\sin\theta - W_\ell\frac{\ell}{2}\cos\theta - W_mx\cos\theta = 0

The first term is the normal reaction force of the wall, with \ell being the length of the ladder. The second term is the weight if the ladder and the final term is the weight of the man.

Do you follow? If so, can you do the same for the torques about the upper point of the ladder?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K