Static vs Kinetic Friction on an Unbanked Ramp

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between static and kinetic friction in the context of an unbanked ramp. Static friction applies when there is no relative motion between surfaces, such as when a wheel rolls without skidding, while kinetic friction occurs during sliding motion. For a wheel in motion, static friction provides the necessary centripetal force to maintain circular motion without slipping. The tangential component of static friction ensures rolling without slipping, which is crucial for maintaining maximum speed. Understanding this difference is essential for correctly applying the principles of friction in physics problems.
mancity
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A car with a mass of 1000 kg is moving on an un-banked ramp with a radius of 100 m. What is the maximum speed the car can move without skidding if the coefficients of static and kinetic friction are 0.80 and 0.60 respectively?
Relevant Equations
mgμ=mv^2/r
I used kinetic friction and did mgμ_k=mv^2/r. However, the solution is mgμ_s=mv^2/r. I am confused on why we consider static friction and not kinetic friction, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mancity said:
I am confused on why we consider static friction and not kinetic friction, thanks!
It is a common misunderstanding.
Friction is about relative motion of surfaces in contact. Kinetic friction occurs when there is such relative motion; static occurs when there is no such relative motion, only the potential for it.
If a wheel is not skidding ("rolling contact") then there is no relative motion. The part of the wheel touching a road has, instantaneously, zero velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes mancity and Tom.G
Here the friction has double role. Besides enabling the rolling without slipping, which applies even when the car moves along a straight road, the friction provides the centripetal force for the circular motion. "Skidding" here refers to the case when the friction is not enough to provide the centripetal force for the car to move in a circle of the given radius with the given velocity. In this case the car moves outwards from the center. You are looking for the situation when this does not happen and the car does not move along the radial direction and the component of the friction acting along the radial direction provides the centripetal force. No motion along the radial direction means that the radial component of friction is static.
There is a tangential component of friction that ensures rolling without slipping. This is also static, as described by @haruspex.
 
Last edited:
nasu said:
There is a tangential component of friction that ensures rolling without slipping.
Only if there is tangential acceleration. This is important since any tangential frictional force contributes to the total frictional force, thereby "using up" some of the available ##\mu_sN## and reducing the max speed.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top