Statics: 3D Equilibrium Problem r X F or Fd?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a 3D equilibrium problem involving a 25-kg rectangular access door held open by a prop. The primary focus is on determining the force F in the prop and the normal forces at hinges A and B. Participants debate the effectiveness of using the cross product versus the force times distance method for calculating moments. The consensus is that while the cross product is mathematically correct, the choice of method should depend on individual comfort and reliability in obtaining the correct solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium principles (ΣF=0, ΣM=0)
  • Familiarity with 3D vector analysis
  • Knowledge of moment calculations using cross products
  • Experience with force and distance relationships in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the application of the cross product in 3D equilibrium problems
  • Study the method of moments using force times distance in static systems
  • Learn about the implications of choosing different methods for solving mechanics problems
  • Investigate common mistakes in calculating moments and forces in static equilibrium
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering mechanics, particularly those studying statics, as well as educators looking to enhance their teaching methods in equilibrium analysis.

J0sh8830
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The 25-kg rectangular access door is held in the 90° open position by the single prop CD. Determine the force F in the prop and the magnitude of the force normal to the hinge axis AB in each of the small hinges A and B.[/B]
w0361.jpg


Homework Equations


ΣF=0
ΣM=0
[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually solved this problem entirely already. I used point A as the origin and I solved by first taking the sum of the moments about the y-axis (since A and B have zero moment arms there, and this just left the weight of the door and the force in the prop CD). I then used the same methods for the other axes until all the forces were found.

My question for everyone is: what works better and is more easier in this situation? Using the cross product or taking (F)(d)? I am having a debate with some of my classmates who think the cross product is a better approach. I think (F)(d) works better because all of the distances are already given in the problem and their would be no need to find position vectors and do lengthy cross products(I think that F(d) is much easier, since each cross product has a total of six separate products to compute). Let me know what you all think and how you might have solved it.

Josh[/B]
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-10-29_22-2-21.png
    upload_2016-10-29_22-2-21.png
    50 KB · Views: 1,196
Physics news on Phys.org
My question for everyone is: what works better and is more easier in this situation? Using the cross product or taking (F)(d)?
The cross product will always be right - but the one that works better (in the sense you are more likely to get the marks) is the one you can use most reliably. That will be different for different people.
Bottom line: define "better".
 
Simon Bridge said:
Bottom line: define "better".

In this particular case, by "better" I mean, which of the two approaches would be the most expedient in finding the solution to this problem? In problems like these, there is usually a number of approaches that can be taken to solve them. Sometimes I have used the cross product when it was probably easier to use force times distance to calculate the moment. Also, I have used force times distance when the cross product would have worked more efficiently. I think what you said makes a lot of sense. That different people will use different approaches, and the one that is most comfortable to them. Thanks!
 
expedient = convenient and practical although possibly improper or immoral? Maybe you mean "easier for you to use"?
... I know you already aid: I think what you said makes a lot of sense. That different people will use different approaches, and the one that is most comfortable to them. Thanks!" ... and thank you.
What I am illustrating here is how carefully asking the question leads you to the answer... this is most of what the scientific method is about.
As soon as you realize you want to know the method you, personally, find easiest, you realize that nobody else can answer that question :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K