Statics - Support Reaction in Truss

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
12 replies · 3K views
Philippe
Messages
9
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm having a hard time finding the support reactions [tex]R_{fx} ; R_{fy} ; R_{kx} ; R_{ky}[/tex] in this truss.

2. The attempt at a solution

I got four equations using the equilibrium conditions (sum of forces along x and y ; sum of moments on F and on C) but the system doesn't seem to have a solution. Am i missing something?

[tex] (\Sigma x = 0) R_{fx} + R_{ky} = 0 \\<br /> (\Sigma y = 0) R_{fy} + R_{ky} = 530 \\<br /> (\Sigma M_{f} = 0) -8R_{kx} + 40R_{ky} = 11100 \\<br /> (\Sigma M_{c} = 0) -20R_{fx} + 20R_{fy} -12 R_{kx} - 20R_{ky} = -500[/tex]

Thanks!
truss.jpg
 

Attachments

  • truss.jpg
    truss.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 722
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
You have treated the whole girder system as a single rigid structure. That means there are only three independent equations available. Any further you write down, whether linear forces or moments, can be deduced from those three.

Is it a single rigid structure?
 
Yes exactly, I noticed that I can obtain the fourth equation from the first three so I need a fourth independent one.
But I'm under the impression that it is a single structure, I guess I'm wrong!
 
Philippe said:
Yes exactly, I noticed that I can obtain the fourth equation from the first three so I need a fourth independent one.
But I'm under the impression that it is a single structure, I guess I'm wrong!
Imagine replacing one of the end supports with a roller. Can you visualise what would happen in reality?
 
The horizontal component of the reaction force would be zero as it free to move in this direction on the end support, right?
 
No, it would collapse.
 
The whole structure would "flatten" and be pushed to the right?
 
Philippe said:
Joint e ?
Right. So the truss system is not in itself a rigid body. Rather, it is two rigid bodies hinged at e. This allows you to write a torque balance equation which is independent of the equations you already have.
Can you see how to do that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Yes it worked!
Thanks a million!