Statistics - Binomial Probability question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the probability of defective computer chips using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution with continuity correction. The user initially calculated the probability using the TI-84+ calculator's binomcdf function but did not apply the continuity correction, resulting in an incorrect answer of 0.5179 instead of the textbook's correct answer of 0.5349. The importance of applying continuity correction in such calculations is emphasized, as it significantly impacts the accuracy of the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial probability distribution
  • Familiarity with normal approximation techniques
  • Experience using the TI-84+ calculator
  • Knowledge of continuity correction in statistical calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about applying continuity correction in binomial probability calculations
  • Study the normal approximation to the binomial distribution in detail
  • Practice using the TI-84+ calculator for statistical functions
  • Explore examples of binomial probability problems with varying parameters
USEFUL FOR

Students in statistics courses, educators teaching probability concepts, and anyone involved in quality control processes in manufacturing.

theIBnerd
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi. i keep finding a different answer than what textbook offers. is my answer correct?

question: the quality control department of a company making computer chips knows that 2% of the chips arw defective. use the nurmal approximation to the binomial probability distribution, with a continuity correction, to find the probability that, in a batch containing 1000 chips, between 20 and 30 chips (inclusive) are defective.

my answer: probability=0.02
using TI 84+
binomcdf(1000,0.02,30)-binomcdf(1000,0.02,19)=0.5179 (its my answer)
but the textbook says the answer is: 0.5349

is there anything wrong with my solution? what do you think is the real answer?

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You aren't using the continuity correction - you aren't even using the normal approximation.
 
statdad said:
You aren't using the continuity correction - you aren't even using the normal approximation.

oh. i will work on that.

turns out my teacher has not said a single word on continuity correction and normal approximation. so i just assumed i could solve it using commulative thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K