Engineering Step response and realiziability of a G(q) transfer function

  • Thread starter Thread starter arhzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the transfer function G#(q) = q * (q^2 + 2q - 3) / (q^2 - 25) and its properties regarding step response, realizability, and BIBO stability. For part c), it is determined that a sampling time Ta = 2/5 allows for BIBO stability, as it positions one pole at -5 and the other at 5. However, for part a), the analysis reveals that the function is not realizable at Ta = 2/5 due to the denominator approaching zero, leading to infinity. The user struggles with part b), seeking guidance on how to analyze the function further. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the conditions for realizability and stability in control theory.
arhzz
Messages
284
Reaction score
58
Homework Statement
-
Relevant Equations
-
Hello!

Consider this transfer function $$ G^\#(q) = q \cdot \frac{q^2 + 2q - 3}{q^2 - 25} $$

a) For which values of Ta > 0 is the G(q) step response capable?
b) For which values of Ta > 0 is the G(q) realizible?
c) Is it possible to find a sampling time Ta > 0 so that the G(q) is BIBO stable?

Now we have a table that defines all 3 of these for the G(q)

$$ \text{Realizability:} \quad \lim_{q \to \Omega_0} |G^\#(q)| < \infty $$
$$ \text{Jump response:} \quad \lim_{q \to \Omega_0} G^\#(q) \neq 0 $$
$$ \text{BIBO Stability:} \quad \text{only poles } q_i \text{ with } \Re(q_i) < 0 \text{ or } q_i = \Omega_0 \\ $$
Where ## \Omega_0## is defined as 2/Ta

So for c) I was able to get a solution. I looked at the denominator and saw that one Pole was -5 and the other 5. For the 5 we need ## \Omega_0 ## to be 5. We can achieve that when Ta = 2/5.

So my solution for c) is Ta = 2/5

a) I did the following. I pluged in ##\Omega_0 ## for q and look at the denominator again. Since we need the limit to not go to infinity, the only case where that happens is when the denominator is 0. I know that division with 0 is not defined, but in this class (control theory) we would say that division to zero (really really small number) would go to infinity.

Now this is what the denominator looks like when I plug in ##\Omega_0## and square it.

$$ \frac{4}{T^2} - 25 $$. Now we need it not to be equal to zero so I find for what values it is 0. And I get that it is 0 when Ta = 2/5

So to complete c) no it is not possible since the function cannot be realized for the sampling time T = 2/5

Now I cannot solve b). When I try plugging in ## \Omega_0 ## for q I just get a really complicated term that does now tell me much. Any advice?, or comments on my solution so far.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plug ##q=2/T## in ##G^{\#}(q)##, What is now the numerator and denominator of Gsharp w.r.t T.
Find which values are poles and which ones are zeros of this function?

After you answer this question then we can proceed from there.
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
582
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
623
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K