Step response and realiziability of a G(q) transfer function

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter arhzz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transfer function $$ G^\#(q) = q \cdot \frac{q^2 + 2q - 3}{q^2 - 25} $$ and its properties regarding step response, realizability, and BIBO stability. The participant successfully determined that for BIBO stability, the sampling time Ta must be 2/5, as it aligns with the pole at 5. However, they concluded that the function cannot be realized for Ta = 2/5 due to the denominator approaching zero. The participant seeks assistance in determining the realizability of the transfer function for various values of Ta.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transfer functions in control theory
  • Knowledge of BIBO stability criteria
  • Familiarity with poles and zeros of functions
  • Experience with limits and their implications in control systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Analyze the poles and zeros of $$ G^\#(q) $$ for various sampling times Ta
  • Investigate the conditions for realizability in control systems
  • Explore the implications of division by zero in transfer functions
  • Learn about the relationship between sampling time and system stability
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, students studying control theory, and anyone involved in analyzing transfer functions and system stability.

arhzz
Messages
284
Reaction score
58
Homework Statement
-
Relevant Equations
-
Hello!

Consider this transfer function $$ G^\#(q) = q \cdot \frac{q^2 + 2q - 3}{q^2 - 25} $$

a) For which values of Ta > 0 is the G(q) step response capable?
b) For which values of Ta > 0 is the G(q) realizible?
c) Is it possible to find a sampling time Ta > 0 so that the G(q) is BIBO stable?

Now we have a table that defines all 3 of these for the G(q)

$$ \text{Realizability:} \quad \lim_{q \to \Omega_0} |G^\#(q)| < \infty $$
$$ \text{Jump response:} \quad \lim_{q \to \Omega_0} G^\#(q) \neq 0 $$
$$ \text{BIBO Stability:} \quad \text{only poles } q_i \text{ with } \Re(q_i) < 0 \text{ or } q_i = \Omega_0 \\ $$
Where ## \Omega_0## is defined as 2/Ta

So for c) I was able to get a solution. I looked at the denominator and saw that one Pole was -5 and the other 5. For the 5 we need ## \Omega_0 ## to be 5. We can achieve that when Ta = 2/5.

So my solution for c) is Ta = 2/5

a) I did the following. I pluged in ##\Omega_0 ## for q and look at the denominator again. Since we need the limit to not go to infinity, the only case where that happens is when the denominator is 0. I know that division with 0 is not defined, but in this class (control theory) we would say that division to zero (really really small number) would go to infinity.

Now this is what the denominator looks like when I plug in ##\Omega_0## and square it.

$$ \frac{4}{T^2} - 25 $$. Now we need it not to be equal to zero so I find for what values it is 0. And I get that it is 0 when Ta = 2/5

So to complete c) no it is not possible since the function cannot be realized for the sampling time T = 2/5

Now I cannot solve b). When I try plugging in ## \Omega_0 ## for q I just get a really complicated term that does now tell me much. Any advice?, or comments on my solution so far.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Plug ##q=2/T## in ##G^{\#}(q)##, What is now the numerator and denominator of Gsharp w.r.t T.
Find which values are poles and which ones are zeros of this function?

After you answer this question then we can proceed from there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
939
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K