Stepper Motor Torque Characteristic Measurement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on measuring the torque characteristics of a stepper motor using a pulley system. The method involves attaching a weight to a string that wraps around a pulley connected to the motor, allowing for the measurement of pull-in and pull-out torque. Key equations include torque = F * length and the relationship between tension in the rope and normal force acting on the pulley. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the effects of string wraps and friction on torque measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque measurement principles
  • Familiarity with stepper motor operation
  • Knowledge of pulley mechanics and friction
  • Basic physics equations related to force and torque
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of friction on pulley systems
  • Learn about stepper motor torque characteristics in detail
  • Study methods for calibrating torque measurement setups
  • Explore advanced torque measurement techniques using digital sensors
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, robotics enthusiasts, and students involved in motor control and mechanical design who seek to understand and measure stepper motor performance accurately.

DBoy00
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am in such a situation, where we are trying to measure the characteristics of a stepping motor in order to verify its operational characteristics.

I have tried measuring the motor's torque in many ways but I am having trouble following the company maker's method given. Perhaps my physics is not good enough, therefore I really want some help.

The question follows:

I am trying to measure pull-in and pull-out torque via analog simple pulley system.

The company showed us a demo on how they obtained their data. I do not fully understand the method.

- The system comprises of the small stepper motor fixed in a V shaped suspension body by means of a rubber clamp

- The motor shaft is connected to a pulley or radius r

- A string fixed to the suspension body comes vertical down and wraps around the pulley twice before going towards the ground with a weight attached W

- The motor is then put under pull-in and pull-out measurements with varying weight

- Pull-in torque being operating the motor from rest with the weight attached, when a full rotation is not achieved after inputting a fixed number of steps, then it has slipped and reached it's limit

- Pull-out torque being accelerating the motor to the wanted speed then adding weigh till the motor stalls or slips

I only know the weight attached to the bottom of the string. I am pondering why the company would use such a method.
The data would be different depending on the string and the amount of times the string wraps around the pulley. Here's a picture to give the idea... I:m going to slap together in paint now. I have attached it since I cannot link without 15 posts... even though I attached it here

2. Homework Equations and questions

torque = F*length, W = mass*gravity, Ffriction = Fn*u

What would be the forces acting on the pulley surrounding the shaft? Would we not need the forced exerted on the point the string is attached to?

How does the tension in the rope relate to the normal force acting along the diameter of the pulley?

Basically how would I find the torque after knowing the weight at the end of the string.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried imagining the tension in the string acting evenly on all parts of the pulley... therefore if the pulley was flattened out then it would be a flat line with T acting on it. Since I wrapped it twice around the pulley, it'd be 2x the torque. However, after looking at it I think it is wrong. There is no way to guarantee that the T in the string would be acting on the pulley evenly. Furthermore T cannot be estimated as T, and Fn on the pulley therefore cannot be just T.

Another method I read in a book suggests that I take the torque as:

torque = (F1 - W)(r + a),

'a' being the rope thickness, 'F1' being the force from the rope above the pulley and 'W' being the weight of the load at the end of the string.
 

Attachments

  • torque.gif
    torque.gif
    3.6 KB · Views: 718
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea is to wrap the pulley enough times so that the force F1 is negligible. Then the torque equals T2*r or Weight*r. Adjusting the number of wraps and the takeoff angle to get F1 small would be simple in practice and I'm sure this is why they use this configuration of torque measurement.

Chris
 
But during the demo experiment I saw, they let the motor rotate without lifting the actual weight.

The pulley was simply rotating with dynamic friction while the rope was around it. That is the primary reason i do not understand this pulley problem. Depending on the turns and depending on the string, all these factors change the load on the torque.
 
DBoy00 said:
But during the demo experiment I saw, they let the motor rotate without lifting the actual weight.

The pulley was simply rotating with dynamic friction while the rope was around it. That is the primary reason i do not understand this pulley problem. Depending on the turns and depending on the string, all these factors change the load on the torque.

Using your descriptors T2=F1*e^[(mu_sub_k)*(theta)]

mu_sub_k is the kinematic coefficient of friction.
theta is the angle of revolutions the string has made around the pulley in radians (2*pi for once around).

If you use a known weight to tension T2 and measure F1 you can calculate mu_sub_k for that particular string and pulley combination. Once calibrated you can change the tension T2 using other weights per the requirements of your test procedure and calculate F1. Then the total torque on the pulley will be (T2*r)+(F1*r).

Chris
 
The total torque on the pulley be (T2*r)-(F1*r)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K