Stern-Gerlach Experimental Calculation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Stern-Gerlach experiment involving hydrogen atoms in an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The key parameters include a magnetic field gradient of 2x10³ T/m and a beam length of 9 cm, with hydrogen atoms at a temperature of 600K. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding magnetic moments, spin, and dipole moments, and highlight the necessity of using the force equation F=(μ·∇)B to determine the beam's position on the detector screen. The outcomes differ significantly from classical expectations, demonstrating quantized spin states and providing evidence for a "spin g-factor" of 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically spin and magnetic moments.
  • Familiarity with the Stern-Gerlach experiment and its implications.
  • Knowledge of classical versus quantum predictions in physics.
  • Proficiency in applying the force equation for magnetic dipoles, F=(μ·∇)B.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Stern-Gerlach experiment in detail, referencing Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics".
  • Learn about the implications of spin g-factors in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic moments and quantum states.
  • Investigate the differences between classical and quantum mechanical predictions in similar experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, quantum mechanics enthusiasts, and researchers interested in the behavior of particles in magnetic fields will benefit from this discussion.

SharkyDx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've run into a problem which has been bugging me for days. I know its related to the Stern-Gerlach experiment about firing hydrogen through an inhomogeneous magnetic field, but all i can do is give a vague qualitative description of the answers, and not an actual numerical one (because I don't entirely know what equations should be useful).

I know there's stuff about magnetic moments and spin and dipole moments happening here, but I can't seem to reconcile all these ideas. I'm not looking for a raw solution (I still want to learn something), just pointers as to the physics that's happening here, and possibly what equations are useful. Thanks.

Consider a well-collimated beam of hydrogen atoms in their ground state (ie with zero orbital angular momentum and spin = 1/2) in which the atoms are in thermal equilibrium at a temperature of 600K. The beam enters a region of length 9cm, in which there is a strong magnetic field with a gradient of 2x10³T/m perpendicular to the axis of the beam. After leaving this region the beam travels 1.2m to a screen.
  1. What distribution of hydrogen atoms would one observe at the detector?
  2. How is this different from classical expectations?
  3. How is this different from non-relativistic quantum predictions?
  4. Where will the beam appear on the screen?
  5. How does this provide evidence for a "spin g-factor" of 2?

I know (basically) that because of the inhomogeneous magnetic field, the atoms experience a force in the z-direction (vertically). Classically, there's stuff about all possible ranges of spin/momentum (or something) which would give a continuous band on the screen. Quantum mechanically, there's stuff about quantized spins that will only allow discrete outcomes, and i think the relativistic bit refers to the spin quantum number, m_s, but it might not. I can kinda handle the first three parts (if I'm even on the right track), but the fourth part - actually finding where the beam will appear - is a bit mysterious at the moment.


Thanks again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
check out the very first chapter of Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics"--it's about the S.G. experiment.
 
For 4, use the equation for the force on a dipole [tex]F=(\mu\cdot\nabla)B[/tex],
wilth spin up and spin down.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K